362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31638801)
1. Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
Lu J; Hou X; Wang C; Zhang Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4540-4549. PubMed ID: 31638801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.
Yang C; Zhang Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(11):2696-2712. PubMed ID: 35579568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lin_F9: A Linear Empirical Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Docking.
Yang C; Zhang Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Sep; 61(9):4630-4644. PubMed ID: 34469692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
Scantlebury J; Vost L; Carbery A; Hadfield TE; Turnbull OM; Brown N; Chenthamarakshan V; Das P; Grosjean H; von Delft F; Deane CM
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2960-2974. PubMed ID: 37166179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
Gaillard T
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a machine-learning model to predict Gibbs free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Biophys Chem; 2018 Sep; 240():63-69. PubMed ID: 29906639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information.
Zhao X; Li H; Zhang K; Huang SY
J Phys Chem B; 2023 Oct; 127(42):9021-9034. PubMed ID: 37822259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Template-Based Method for Conformation Generation and Scoring for Congeneric Series of Ligands.
Raman EP
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2690-2701. PubMed ID: 31045363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast Rescoring Protocols to Improve the Performance of Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performed on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
Singh N; Chaput L; Villoutreix BO
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Aug; 60(8):3910-3934. PubMed ID: 32786511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine-learning scoring functions trained on complexes dissimilar to the test set already outperform classical counterparts on a blind benchmark.
Li H; Lu G; Sze KH; Su X; Chan WY; Leung KS
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34169324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Kadukova M; Grudinin S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 28913782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization.
Kadukova M; Grudinin S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Oct; 31(10):943-958. PubMed ID: 28921375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy.
Bjerrum EJ
Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 62():133-44. PubMed ID: 27179709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
