These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3163964)

  • 41. [Prevalence of approximal enamel lesions on bitewing radiographs in cohorts, ages 14 to 23 years].
    Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kieft JA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Feb; 108(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 11383279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radiographic diagnoses and treatment decisions on approximal caries.
    Espelid I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Oct; 14(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 3466745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of diagnostic threshold and overlapped approximal surfaces on reported caries status.
    Rimmer PA; Pitts NB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1991 Aug; 19(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 1889192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cost-Effectiveness through the Dental-Health FRAMM Guideline for Caries Prevention among 12- to 15-Year-Olds in Sweden.
    Bergström EK; Davidson T; Moberg Sköld U
    Caries Res; 2019; 53(3):339-346. PubMed ID: 30650426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Caries and restoration prevention.
    Mjör IA; Holst D; Eriksen HM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 May; 139(5):565-70; quiz 626. PubMed ID: 18451372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A prospective comparison between findings from a clinical examination and results of bitewing and panoramic radiographs for dental caries diagnosis in children.
    Clark HC; Curzon ME
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Dec; 5(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 15606318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age.
    Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Plaque and gingival status as indicators for caries progression on approximal surfaces.
    Ekstrand KR; Bruun G; Bruun M
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9438570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Incidence and progression of approximal caries from 11 to 22 years of age in Sweden: A prospective radiographic study.
    Mejàre I; Källest l C; Stenlund H
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9892776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Caries rates related to approximal caries at ages 11-13: a 10-year follow-up study in Sweden.
    Stenlund H; Mejàre I; Källestål C
    J Dent Res; 2002 Jul; 81(7):455-8. PubMed ID: 12161455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Oral hygiene as a variable in dental caries experience in 14-year-olds exposed to fluoride.
    Mathiesen AT; Ogaard B; Rølla G
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8850580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A clinical and radiographic comparison of caries diagnosed in approximal surfaces of posterior teeth in a low-risk population of 14-year-old children.
    Llena-Puy C; Forner L
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2005; 3(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 15921337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Oral health of individuals aged 3-80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 40 years (1973-2013). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings.
    Norderyd O; Koch G; Papias A; Köhler AA; Helkimo AN; Brahm CO; Lindmark U; Lindfors N; Mattsson A; Rolander B; Ullbro C; Gerdin EW; Frisk F
    Swed Dent J; 2015; 39(2):69-86. PubMed ID: 26529833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Value of bite-wing radiographs in a clinical epidemiological study and their effect on the DMFS index.
    Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kieft JA; Kalsbeek H
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 10773634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Caries development in a young population managed by a restrictive attitude to radiography and operative intervention: I. A study at the patient level.
    Lith A; Lindstrand C; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 12087439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The difference between clinical and bitewing detection of approximal and occlusal caries in Royal Air Force recruits.
    Richardson PS; McIntyre IG
    Community Dent Health; 1996 Jun; 13(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 8763134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Skeie MS; Raadal M; Strand GV; Espelid I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 May; 16(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 16643535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Caries prevalence and distribution in individuals aged 3-20 years in Jönköping, Sweden: trends over 40 years.
    Koch G; Helkimo AN; Ullbro C
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Oct; 18(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 28956292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Caries and fillings in the permanent dentition of cohorts of schoolchildren in Espoo, Finland.
    Nordblad A; Larmas MA
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Oct; 14(5):271-3. PubMed ID: 3466746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Radiographic versus clinical diagnosis of approximal carious lesions.
    de Vries HC; Ruiken HM; König KG; van 't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 1990; 24(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 2261609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.