322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31640567)
1. BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses.
Béliveau A; Boyne DJ; Slater J; Brenner D; Arora P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):196. PubMed ID: 31640567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting quality of systematic reviews with network meta-analyses in Endodontics.
Nagendrababu V; Narasimhan S; Faggion CM; Dharmarajan L; Jacob PS; Gopinath VK; Dummer PMH
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3437-3445. PubMed ID: 36914841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Mutation Portraits of Oncogenes and Tumor Supressor Genes in Predicting the Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Aryanti C; Uwuratuw JA; Labeda I; Raharjo W; Lusikooy RE; Rauf MA; Mappincara A; Sampetoding S; Kusuma MI; Syarifuddin E
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Aug; 24(8):2895-2902. PubMed ID: 37642079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review.
Tonin FS; Borba HH; Leonart LP; Mendes AM; Steimbach LM; Pontarolo R; Fernandez-Llimos F
Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):620-632. PubMed ID: 30212868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidemiological, methodological, and statistical characteristics of network meta-analysis in anaesthesia: a systematic review.
Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
Br J Anaesth; 2023 Mar; 130(3):272-286. PubMed ID: 36404140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis.
Veroniki AA; Tsokani S; Zevgiti S; Pagkalidou I; Kontouli KM; Ambarcioglu P; Pandis N; Lunny C; Nikolakopoulou A; Papakonstantinou T; Chaimani A; Straus SE; Hutton B; Tricco AC; Mavridis D; Salanti G
Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 10(1):246. PubMed ID: 34507621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
Gao Y; Ge L; Ma X; Shen X; Liu M; Tian J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():214-227. PubMed ID: 31150834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What guidance are researchers given on how to present network meta-analyses to end-users such as policymakers and clinicians? A systematic review.
Sullivan SM; Coyle D; Wells G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113277. PubMed ID: 25517510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses--an overview and application of NetMetaXL.
Brown S; Hutton B; Clifford T; Coyle D; Grima D; Wells G; Cameron C
Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; 3():110. PubMed ID: 25267416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
Spineli LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MetaInsight: An interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta-analyses using R-shiny and netmeta.
Owen RK; Bradbury N; Xin Y; Cooper N; Sutton A
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):569-581. PubMed ID: 31349391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using R software.
Shim SR; Kim SJ; Lee J; Rücker G
Epidemiol Health; 2019; 41():e2019013. PubMed ID: 30999733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Software and package applicating for network meta-analysis: A usage-based comparative study.
Xu C; Niu Y; Wu J; Gu H; Zhang C
J Evid Based Med; 2018 Aug; 11(3):176-183. PubMed ID: 29266878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis.
Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M
Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-Review: Network Meta-Analyses in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Cortese S; Tomlinson A; Cipriani A
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2019 Feb; 58(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 30738544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical quality evaluation of network meta-analyses in dental care.
Lee DW; Shin IS
J Dent; 2018 Aug; 75():7-11. PubMed ID: 29879456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence inconsistency degrees of freedom in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Lin L
J Biopharm Stat; 2021 May; 31(3):317-330. PubMed ID: 33296239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture.
Bae K; Shin IS
Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2021 Nov; 45():101459. PubMed ID: 34388562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
