These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31641234)

  • 1. A Consumer Neuroscience Study of Conscious and Subconscious Destination Preference.
    Zoëga Ramsøy T; Michael N; Michael I
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15102. PubMed ID: 31641234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural signals of selective attention are modulated by subjective preferences and buying decisions in a virtual shopping task.
    Goto N; Mushtaq F; Shee D; Lim XL; Mortazavi M; Watabe M; Schaefer A
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Sep; 128():11-20. PubMed ID: 28666891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study on Tourism Consumer Behavior and Countermeasures Based on Big Data.
    Li J; Cao B
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():6120511. PubMed ID: 35909820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a comparative science of emotion: Affect and consciousness in humans and animals.
    Paul ES; Sher S; Tamietto M; Winkielman P; Mendl MT
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2020 Jan; 108():749-770. PubMed ID: 31778680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A small frog that makes a big difference: brain wave testing of TV advertisements.
    Ohme R; Matukin M
    IEEE Pulse; 2012; 3(3):28-33. PubMed ID: 22678837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is choice-induced preference change long lasting?
    Sharot T; Fleming SM; Yu X; Koster R; Dolan RJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1123-1129. PubMed ID: 22933456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A gateway to consumers' minds: Achievements, caveats, and prospects of electroencephalography-based prediction in neuromarketing.
    Hakim A; Levy DJ
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 10(2):e1485. PubMed ID: 30496636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: A systematic review.
    Stasi A; Songa G; Mauri M; Ciceri A; Diotallevi F; Nardone G; Russo V
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jun; 108():650-664. PubMed ID: 29735101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of EEG power for the prediction and interpretation of consumer decision-making: A neuromarketing study.
    Golnar-Nik P; Farashi S; Safari MS
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Aug; 207():90-98. PubMed ID: 31047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recording brain waves at the supermarket: what can we learn from a shopper's brain?
    Sands SF; Sands JA
    IEEE Pulse; 2012; 3(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 22678838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do isolated packaging variables influence consumers' attention and preferences?
    García-Madariaga J; Blasco López MF; Burgos IM; Virto NR
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Mar; 200():96-103. PubMed ID: 29702121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Picking Your Brains: Where and How Neuroscience Tools Can Enhance Marketing Research.
    Alvino L; Pavone L; Abhishta A; Robben H
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():577666. PubMed ID: 33343279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustaining Sporting Destinations through Improving Tourists' Mental and Physical Health in the Tourism Environment: The Case of Korea.
    Jeong Y; Kim SK; Yu JG
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31877974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference.
    Dohmen T; Falk A; Huffman D; Sunde U
    J Econ Perspect; 2018; 32(2):115-34. PubMed ID: 30203932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting consumer liking and preference based on emotional responses and sensory perception: A study with basic taste solutions.
    Samant SS; Chapko MJ; Seo HS
    Food Res Int; 2017 Oct; 100(Pt 1):325-334. PubMed ID: 28873694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unconscious biases in task choices depend on conscious expectations.
    González-García C; Tudela P; Ruz M
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():44-56. PubMed ID: 26280375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of subconscious and conscious emotions on human cue-reward association learning.
    Watanabe N; Haruno M
    Sci Rep; 2015 Feb; 5():8478. PubMed ID: 25684237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conscious and unconscious expectancy effects: A behavioral, scalp and intracranial electroencephalography study.
    Rozier C; Seidel Malkinson T; Hasboun D; Baulac M; Adam C; Lehongre K; Clémenceau S; Navarro V; Naccache L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Feb; 131(2):385-400. PubMed ID: 31865140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.
    Manigault AW; Handley IM; Whillock SR
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e37. PubMed ID: 25677337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of selected neuroscientific methods in consumer sensory analysis: A review.
    Adhikari K
    J Food Sci; 2023 Mar; 88(S1):53-64. PubMed ID: 36915966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.