170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31641953)
1. Transitional changes of acetylcholine spasm provocation test procedures.
Sueda S; Kohno H
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2020 Oct; 35(4):321-326. PubMed ID: 31641953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acetylcholine spasm provocation test by trans-radial artery and brachial vein approach.
Sueda S; Fujimoto K; Sasaki Y; Sakaue T; Habara H; Kohno H
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 94(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 30548131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm.
Sueda S; Miyoshi T; Sasaki Y; Sakaue T; Habara H; Kohno H
Heart Vessels; 2016 Feb; 31(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 25366987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender differences in sensitivity of acetylcholine and ergonovine to coronary spasm provocation test.
Sueda S; Miyoshi T; Sasaki Y; Sakaue T; Habara H; Kohno H
Heart Vessels; 2016 Mar; 31(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 25539623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequential spasm provocation tests might overcome a limitation of the standard spasm provocation tests.
Sueda S; Miyoshi T; Sasaki Y; Sakaue T; Habara H; Kohno H
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Sep; 26(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 25974266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and potential usefulness of sequential intracoronary acetylcholine and ergonovine administration for spasm provocation testing.
Kinoshita Y; Saito Y; Kikuta Y; Sato K; Taniguchi M; Goto K; Takebayashi H; Haruta S; Kobayashi Y
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2024; 18():17539447241233168. PubMed ID: 38396350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pharmacological spasm provocation testing in 2500 patients: provoked spasm incidence, complications and cardiac events.
Sueda S
Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1368-1377. PubMed ID: 32350639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical impact of selective spasm provocation tests: comparisons between acetylcholine and ergonovine in 1508 examinations.
Sueda S; Kohno H; Fukuda H; Ochi N; Kawada H; Hayashi Y; Uraoka T
Coron Artery Dis; 2004 Dec; 15(8):491-7. PubMed ID: 15585990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-brachial ergonovine, not acetylcholine, is associated with radial artery vasospasm in patients with coronary vasospasm.
Wu YY; Mao WW; Li YF; Zhang Q; Zhang B; Sheng ZQ
Acta Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 78(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 35899777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of coronary artery spasm by two pharmacological agents: comparison between intracoronary injection of acetylcholine and ergonovine.
Sueda S; Kohno H; Fukuda H; Ochi N; Kawada H; Hayashi Y; Uraoka T
Coron Artery Dis; 2003 Sep; 14(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 12966266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overview of complications during pharmacological spasm provocation tests.
Sueda S; Kohno H
J Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 68(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27234219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety of intracoronary provocative testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm.
Ciliberti G; Seshasai SRK; Ambrosio G; Kaski JC
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 244():77-83. PubMed ID: 28622945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overview of the Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Test.
Sueda S; Kohno H; Ochi T; Uraoka T
Clin Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 38(7):430-8. PubMed ID: 26175183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential incidence and morphology of provoked spasm between intracoronary acetylcholine and ergonovine testing: recommendation of supplementary use.
Sueda S; Fujimoto K; Sasaki Y; Sakaue T; Yoshii T; Habara H; Kohno H
Heart Vessels; 2019 May; 34(5):745-754. PubMed ID: 30474702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serious cardiac complications in coronary spasm provocation tests using acetylcholine or ergonovine: analysis of 21 512 patients from the diagnosis procedure combination database in Japan.
Isogai T; Yasunaga H; Matsui H; Tanaka H; Ueda T; Horiguchi H; Fushimi K
Clin Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 25693967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New combined spasm provocation test in patients with rest angina: intracoronary injection of acetylcholine after intracoronary administration of ergonovine.
Sueda S; Ochi T; Yano K; Mineoi K; Kondou T; Ochi N; Hayashi Y; Kukita H; Matsuda S; Kawada H; Tsuruoka T; Uraoka T
Jpn Circ J; 2000 Aug; 64(8):559-65. PubMed ID: 10952150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary vasomotor response to intracoronary acetylcholine injection, clinical features, and long-term prognosis in 873 consecutive patients with coronary spasm: analysis of a single-center study over 20 years.
Sato K; Kaikita K; Nakayama N; Horio E; Yoshimura H; Ono T; Ohba K; Tsujita K; Kojima S; Tayama S; Hokimoto S; Matsui K; Sugiyama S; Yamabe H; Ogawa H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2013 Jul; 2(4):e000227. PubMed ID: 23858100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vasospastic Angina Diagnosed by the Spasm Provocation Test with the Combined Use of the Acetylcholine and Ergonovine Provocation Tests.
Matsumura M; Oshita C; Fujii Y; Ueda T; Teragawa H
Intern Med; 2019 Aug; 58(16):2377-2381. PubMed ID: 31118393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maximal acetylcholine dose of 200 μg into the left coronary artery as a spasm provocation test: comparison with 100 μg of acetylcholine.
Sueda S; Kohno H; Miyoshi T; Sakaue T; Sasaki Y; Habara H
Heart Vessels; 2015 Nov; 30(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 25179297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of vasomotion type on prognosis of coronary artery spasm induced by acetylcholine provocation test of left coronary artery.
Lee EM; Choi MH; Seo HS; Kim HK; Kim NH; Choi CU; Kim JW; Lim HE; Kim EJ; Rha SW; Park CG; Oh DJ
Atherosclerosis; 2017 Feb; 257():195-200. PubMed ID: 28012648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
