25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31642578)
1. Comparing the variances of several treatments with that of a control treatment: Theory and applications.
Kong J; Lu H
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0296376. PubMed ID: 38215073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving clinical trial efficiency by biomarker-guided patient selection.
Boessen R; Heerspink HJ; De Zeeuw D; Grobbee DE; Groenwold RH; Roes KC
Trials; 2014 Apr; 15():103. PubMed ID: 24690215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blinded sample size recalculation in multiple composite population designs with normal data and baseline adjustments.
Gera RG; Friede T
Biom J; 2023 Oct; 65(7):e2000326. PubMed ID: 37309256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Type-I-error rate inflation in mixed models for repeated measures caused by ambiguous or incomplete model specifications.
Häckl S; Koch A; Lasch F
Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(6):1046-1061. PubMed ID: 37519010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reverse graphical approaches for multiple test procedures.
Gou J
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jan; 34(1):90-110. PubMed ID: 36757196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 3-step approach to predict advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: impact on diagnosis, patient burden, and medical costs.
Kobayashi T; Ogawa Y; Shinoda S; Iwaki M; Nogami A; Honda Y; Kessoku T; Imajo K; Yoneda M; Saito S; Yamamoto K; Oeda S; Takahashi H; Sumida Y; Nakajima A
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):18174. PubMed ID: 36307441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compbdt: an R program to compare two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design.
Roldán-Nofuentes JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):143. PubMed ID: 32503431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Matched-pair noninferiority trials using rate ratio: a comparison of current methods and sample size refinement.
Tang ML
Control Clin Trials; 2003 Aug; 24(4):364-77. PubMed ID: 12865032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An exact test for comparing two predictive values in small-size clinical trials.
Takahashi K; Yamamoto K
Pharm Stat; 2020 Jan; 19(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 31642578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-stage optimal designs based on exact variance for a single-arm trial with survival endpoints.
Shan G
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):797-805. PubMed ID: 32129130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An internal pilot design for prospective cancer screening trials with unknown disease prevalence.
Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH
Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():458. PubMed ID: 26463684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests.
Kosinski AS
Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(6):964-77. PubMed ID: 22912343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical analysis of noninferiority trials with a rate ratio in small-sample matched-pair designs.
Chan IS; Tang NS; Tang ML; Chan PS
Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1170-7. PubMed ID: 14969498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
