These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31642713)

  • 1. Implementation of a modified quality assurance protocol for CBCT machines within UT health San Antonio School of Dentistry.
    Shahbazi Moghaddam A; Kats JC; Katkar R; Diogenes AR; Yeh CK; Deahl ST
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Feb; 49(2):20190229. PubMed ID: 31642713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom.
    Bamba J; Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20120445. PubMed ID: 23956235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units.
    Spin-Neto R; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130376. PubMed ID: 24678846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CBCT image quality QA: Establishing a quantitative program.
    Taneja S; Barbee DL; Rea AJ; Malin M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):215-225. PubMed ID: 33078562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of image quality and dose calculation accuracy on kV CBCT, MV CBCT, and MV CT images for urgent palliative radiotherapy treatments.
    Held M; Cremers F; Sneed PK; Braunstein S; Fogh SE; Nakamura J; Barani I; Perez-Andujar A; Pouliot J; Morin O
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):279-290. PubMed ID: 27074487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
    Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardized method to quantify the variation in voxel value distribution in patient-simulated CBCT data sets.
    Spin-Neto R; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140283. PubMed ID: 25354021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of dental cone-beam CT pixel data and a modified method for conversion to Hounsfield unit (HU).
    Magill D; Beckmann N; Felice MA; Yoo T; Luo M; Mupparapu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170321. PubMed ID: 29076750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review.
    de Oliveira MV; Wenzel A; Campos PS; Spin-Neto R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160329. PubMed ID: 28045345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
    Elsaltani MH; Farid MM; Eldin Ashmawy MS
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts.
    Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180151. PubMed ID: 29916722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Nackaerts O; ; Willems G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e129-39. PubMed ID: 21889061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
    Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic-based Assessment of Filled C-shaped Canals: Artifact Expression of Cone-beam Computed Tomography as Opposed to Micro-computed Tomography and Nano-computed Tomography.
    Mazzi-Chaves JF; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1702-1711. PubMed ID: 32682791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices.
    Lindfors N; Lund H; Johansson H; Ekestubbe A
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2017; 4():132-137. PubMed ID: 29159206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose indices in dental cone beam CT and correlation with dose-area product.
    Araki K; Patil S; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120362. PubMed ID: 23520392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
    Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
    Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.