These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31642968)

  • 21. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique.
    Jayne DG; Brown JM; Thorpe H; Walker J; Quirke P; Guillou PJ
    Br J Surg; 2005 Sep; 92(9):1124-32. PubMed ID: 15997446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
    Gitas G; Alkatout I; Proppe L; Hanker L; Allahqoli L; Grimbizis G; Rody A; Werner N; Sommer S; Baum S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jun; 305(6):1481-1490. PubMed ID: 34954814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Outcomes of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: an observational single hospital study of 300 cases.
    Del Gutiérrez Delgado MP; Mera Velasco S; Turiño Luque JD; González Poveda I; Ruiz López M; Santoyo Santoyo J
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 33743145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Open Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Kim MJ; Park SC; Park JW; Chang HJ; Kim DY; Nam BH; Sohn DK; Oh JH
    Ann Surg; 2018 Feb; 267(2):243-251. PubMed ID: 28549014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection.
    Corrigan N; Marshall H; Croft J; Copeland J; Jayne D; Brown J
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):339. PubMed ID: 29945673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Rectal Cancer - Robotic Setup, Port Placement, Structured Surgical Steps].
    Türler A; Loriz HL; Schröder T; Cerasani N
    Zentralbl Chir; 2020 Jun; 145(3):225-233. PubMed ID: 32498104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Colorectal Cancer Surgery Using the Da Vinci Xi and Si Systems: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.
    Huang YM; Huang YJ; Wei PL
    Surg Innov; 2019 Apr; 26(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 30501567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Precision in robotic rectal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system and integrated table motion, a technical note.
    Panteleimonitis S; Harper M; Hall S; Figueiredo N; Qureshi T; Parvaiz A
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):433-436. PubMed ID: 28916892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Potential urinary function benefits of initial robotic surgery for rectal cancer in the introductory phase.
    Oshio H; Oshima Y; Yunome G; Yano M; Okazaki S; Ashitomi Y; Musha H; Kamio Y; Motoi F
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 33723792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection.
    Tolstrup R; Funder JA; Lundbech L; Thomassen N; Iversen LH
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Mar; 33(3):285-289. PubMed ID: 29242972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surgical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
    Gitas G; Alkatout I; Proppe L; Werner N; Rody A; Hanker L; Pados G; Freytag D; Sommer S; Baum S
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Jun; 17(3):e2225. PubMed ID: 33440062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?
    Bayraktar O; Aytaç E; Özben V; Atasoy D; Bilgin İA; Erenler Bayraktar İ; Baca B; Hamzaoğlu İ; Karahasanoğlu T
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2018 Feb; 28(1):e8-e11. PubMed ID: 29252933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.
    Coughlin GD; Yaxley JW; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Teloken P; Dunglison N; Williams S; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 30017351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of robotic-assisted resection alone and with natural orifice specimen extraction for rectal cancer by using Da Vinci Xi.
    Aslaner A; Çakır T; Eyvaz K; Kazım Kazan M; Can Çakır R; Doğan U; Rıza Gündüz U
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Sep; 26(18):6665-6670. PubMed ID: 36196717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory stress response in malignant robot-assisted colorectal resections: a retrospective cohort study of 298 patients.
    Cuk P; Simonsen RM; Komljen M; Nielsen MF; Helligsø P; Pedersen AK; Mogensen CB; Ellebæk MB
    World J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 19(1):155. PubMed ID: 34022914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon's experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si.
    Morelli L; Guadagni S; Lorenzoni V; Di Franco G; Cobuccio L; Palmeri M; Caprili G; D'Isidoro C; Moglia A; Ferrari V; Di Candio G; Mosca F; Turchetti G
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1639-48. PubMed ID: 27475091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic Colorectal Resection With and Without the Use of the New Da Vinci Table Motion: A Case-Matched Study.
    Palmeri M; Gianardi D; Guadagni S; Di Franco G; Bastiani L; Furbetta N; Simoncini T; Zirafa C; Melfi F; Buccianti P; Moglia A; Cuschieri A; Mosca F; Morelli L
    Surg Innov; 2018 Jun; 25(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 29577830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery.
    Kim HJ; Choi GS; Park JS; Park SY; Yang CS; Lee HJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 May; 20(5):O103-O113. PubMed ID: 29460997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feasibility and Safety of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Pilot Study with da Vinci Xi Platform During COVID-19.
    Bliznakova K; Kolev N; Zlatarov A; Kalinov T; Georgiev T
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2023 Feb; 118(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 36913415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.