These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31643116)

  • 1. Transparency improves concealment in cryptically coloured moths.
    Arias M; Elias M; Andraud C; Berthier S; Gomez D
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Feb; 33(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 31643116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imperfections in transparency and mimicry do not increase predation risk for clearwing butterflies with educated predators.
    Yeager J; Robison A; Wade CD; Barnett JB
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Sep; 14(9):e70307. PubMed ID: 39310733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partial wing transparency works better when disrupting wing edges: Evidence from a field experiment.
    Arias M; Leroy L; Madec C; Matos L; Tedore C; Elias M; Gomez D
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Nov; 34(11):1840-1846. PubMed ID: 34601773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why has transparency evolved in aposematic butterflies? Insights from the largest radiation of aposematic butterflies, the Ithomiini.
    McClure M; Clerc C; Desbois C; Meichanetzoglou A; Cau M; Bastin-Héline L; Bacigalupo J; Houssin C; Pinna C; Nay B; Llaurens V; Berthier S; Andraud C; Gomez D; Elias M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 286(1901):20182769. PubMed ID: 30991931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size-dependent predation risk in tree-feeding insects with different colouration strategies: a field experiment.
    Remmel T; Tammaru T
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Sep; 78(5):973-80. PubMed ID: 19493131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overcoming the detectability costs of symmetrical coloration.
    Wainwright JB; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1918):20192664. PubMed ID: 31937221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.
    Schaefer HM; Stobbe N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2427-32. PubMed ID: 16959631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body size affects the evolution of hidden colour signals in moths.
    Kang C; Zahiri R; Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Aug; 284(1861):. PubMed ID: 28855366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sphingid caterpillars conspicuous patches do not function as distractive marks or warning against predators.
    Barrone J; Vidal MC; Stevenson R
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e10334. PubMed ID: 37492454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolution of colour polymorphism in British winter-active Lepidoptera in response to search image use by avian predators.
    Weir JC
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Aug; 31(8):1109-1126. PubMed ID: 29746729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ontogenetic colour change and the evolution of aposematism: a case study in panic moth caterpillars.
    Grant JB
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 17439461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
    Riipi M; Alatalo RV; Lindström L; Mappes J
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):512-4. PubMed ID: 11586357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Camouflage in lichen moths: Field predation experiments and avian vision modelling demonstrate the importance of wing pattern elements and background for survival.
    Mark CJ; O'Hanlon JC; Holwell GI
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Dec; 91(12):2358-2369. PubMed ID: 36169598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multimodal warning signals for a multiple predator world.
    Ratcliffe JM; Nydam ML
    Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7209):96-9. PubMed ID: 18769439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.
    Fraser S; Callahan A; Klassen D; Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does avian conspicuous colouration increase or reduce predation risk?
    Ruiz-Rodríguez M; Avilés JM; Cuervo JJ; Parejo D; Ruano F; Zamora-Muñoz C; Sergio F; López-Jiménez L; Tanferna A; Martín-Vivaldi M
    Oecologia; 2013 Sep; 173(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 23386048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distance-dependent pattern blending can camouflage salient aposematic signals.
    Barnett JB; Cuthill IC; Scott-Samuel NE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1858):. PubMed ID: 28679722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.