These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3164321)

  • 21. Cranial bone apposition and ingrowth in a porous nickel-titanium implant.
    Simske SJ; Sachdeva R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 7622538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Composite implants for orthopedic applications: in vivo evaluation of candidate resins.
    Jacobs ML; Black J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 1176503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experimental implantation of hydrogel into the bone.
    Korbelár P; Vacík J; Dylevský I
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Sep; 22(9):751-62. PubMed ID: 3220843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New bone and connective tissue ingrowth in a hydroxyapatite block repairing a rabbit skull defect.
    Lindholm TC; Lindholm TS
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1993; 207():109-15. PubMed ID: 8154824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bone formation and implant degradation of coralline porous ceramics placed in bone and ectopic sites.
    Pollick S; Shors EC; Holmes RE; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Aug; 53(8):915-22; discussion 922-3. PubMed ID: 7629620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Histologic response to porous PMMA implant materials.
    Nathanson D; Gettleman L; Schnitman P; Shklar G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Jan; 12(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 416033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peri- and intra-implant bone response to microporous Ti coatings with surface modification.
    Braem A; Chaudhari A; Vivan Cardoso M; Schrooten J; Duyck J; Vleugels J
    Acta Biomater; 2014 Feb; 10(2):986-95. PubMed ID: 24161385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Studies on the cell and tissue tolerance of a polymeric bone replacement material].
    Augthun M; Bilo R; Hauptmann S; Richter H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):702-4. PubMed ID: 1817868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 1-year study of osteoinduction in hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: part I.
    Gosain AK; Song L; Riordan P; Amarante MT; Nagy PG; Wilson CR; Toth JM; Ricci JL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Feb; 109(2):619-30. PubMed ID: 11818845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of nitinol implant porosity on cranial bone ingrowth and apposition after 6 weeks.
    Ayers RA; Simske SJ; Bateman TA; Petkus A; Sachdeva RL; Gyunter VE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999 Apr; 45(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 10397956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
    Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of sucralfate and basic fibroblast growth factor on fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene alloplastic implants using a novel rabbit model.
    Rubin PA; Nicaeus TE; Warner MA; Remulla HD
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Mar; 13(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 9076777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reaction of bone to methacrylate: interface remodelling.
    Portigliatti Barbos M; Bacchini B; Balbo C; Viglino C
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1991; 57(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 1950507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Theoretical model to determine the effects of geometrical factors on the resorption of calcium phosphate bone substitutes.
    Bohner M; Baumgart F
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3569-82. PubMed ID: 15020131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of alloplastic implant onlays on bone in the rabbit mandible.
    Wellisz T; Lawrence M; Jazayeri MA; Golshani S; Zhou ZY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Sep; 96(4):957-63. PubMed ID: 7652071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical, radiographical, and histological evaluation of porous rooted polymethylmethacrylate dental implants.
    Peterson LJ; Pennel BM; McKinney RV; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Dent Res; 1979 Jan; 58(1):489-96. PubMed ID: 282305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microtopography and soft tissue response.
    Campbell CE; von Recum AF
    J Invest Surg; 1989; 2(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 2487399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Numerical simulation of heating from an acrylic implant in bone.
    Peng L; Nelson DA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1991; 27():253-61. PubMed ID: 2065163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of soft tissue coverage over porous polymethylmethacrylate space maintainers within nonhealing alveolar bone defects.
    Kretlow JD; Shi M; Young S; Spicer PP; Demian N; Jansen JA; Wong ME; Kasper FK; Mikos AG
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2010 Dec; 16(6):1427-38. PubMed ID: 20524844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.
    Bobyn JD; Stackpool GJ; Hacking SA; Tanzer M; Krygier JJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Sep; 81(5):907-14. PubMed ID: 10530861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.