BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31645245)

  • 1. The Current Dietary Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food Underestimates the Actual Risk.
    Zarn JA; Geiser HC
    Chimia (Aarau); 2019 Oct; 73(10):832-834. PubMed ID: 31645245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations.
    Zarn JA; O'Brien CD
    Arch Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 92(1):157-167. PubMed ID: 28929275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Background to the ADI/TDI/PTWI.
    Herrman JL; Younes M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S109-13. PubMed ID: 10597623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision of estimates of an ADI (or TDI or PTWI).
    Speijers GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S87-93. PubMed ID: 10597619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significance of excursions above the ADI: duration in relation to pivotal studies.
    Walker R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S114-8. PubMed ID: 10597624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Report of workshop on the significance of excursions of intake above the ADI.
    Larsen JC; Richold M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S2-12. PubMed ID: 10597607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study parameters influencing NOAEL and LOAEL in toxicity feeding studies for pesticides: exposure duration versus dose decrement, dose spacing, group size and chemical class.
    Zarn JA; Engeli BE; Schlatter JR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Nov; 61(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 21875639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of in vitro data in the derivation of the acceptable daily intake of food additives.
    Walton K; Walker R; van de Sandt JJ; Castell JV; Knapp AG; Kozianowski G; Roberfroid M; Schilter B
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1999 Dec; 37(12):1175-97. PubMed ID: 10654594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study of the relationships between exposure periods and no-effect doses in repeated dose toxicity tests].
    Aida Y; Kamata E; Nakadate M
    Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku; 1992; (110):48-53. PubMed ID: 1364436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
    Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toxicity testing and derivation of the ADI.
    Walker R
    Food Addit Contam; 1998; 15 Suppl():11-6. PubMed ID: 9602908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Needs and methods for priority setting for estimating the intake of food additives.
    Renwick AG
    Food Addit Contam; 1996; 13(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 8792138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Derivation of safe health-based exposure limits for potential consumer exposure to styrene migrating into food from food containers.
    Gelbke HP; Banton M; Faes E; Leibold E; Pemberton M; Duhayon S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 64():258-69. PubMed ID: 24316211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the acceptable daily intake as presently used an axiom or a dogma?
    Galli CL; Marinovich M; Lotti M
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 18588960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment of thujone in foods and medicines containing sage and wormwood--evidence for a need of regulatory changes?
    Lachenmeier DW; Uebelacker M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 20727933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of points of departure between subchronic and chronic toxicity studies on food additives, food contaminants and natural food constituents.
    Guth S; Roth A; Engeli B; Lachenmeier DW; Cartus AT; Hüser S; Baum M; Diel P; Eisenbrand G; Hengstler JG; Humpf HU; Joost HG; Lampen A; Leist M; Marko D; Steinberg P; Mally A; Zarn JA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2020 Dec; 146():111784. PubMed ID: 32998026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of intake from the diet.
    Kroes R; Müller D; Lambe J; Löwik MR; van Klaveren J; Kleiner J; Massey R; Mayer S; Urieta I; Verger P; Visconti A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2002; 40(2-3):327-85. PubMed ID: 11893401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dietary exposures for the safety assessment of seven emulsifiers commonly added to foods in the United States and implications for safety.
    Shah R; Kolanos R; DiNovi MJ; Mattia A; Kaneko KJ
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2017 Jun; 34(6):905-917. PubMed ID: 28346062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The significance of the subchronic toxicity in the dietary risk assessment of pesticides.
    Zarn JA; Hänggi E; Kuchen A; Schlatter JR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Oct; 58(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.