These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The Belle Maudsley memorial lecture 1984. The bionator: its use and 'abuse'. Part 2. Problems and progress. Hunt NP; Ellisdon PS Dent Update; 1985 Mar; 12(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 3859426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. Part 3. Functional appliance therapy'. Bass NM Br Dent J; 1990 May; 168(10):385-6. PubMed ID: 2346690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The passive activator: case selection, treatment response, and corrective mechanics. Reey RW; Eastwood A Am J Orthod; 1978 Apr; 73(4):378-409. PubMed ID: 274910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. Wieslander L; Lagerström L Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Pancherz H; Hägg U Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone remodeling, a new orthodontic approach for interceptive and total mixed dentition therapy. Kussick L ASDC J Dent Child; 1978; 45(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 344352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Herbst appliance--its biologic effects and clinical use. Pancherz H Am J Orthod; 1985 Jan; 87(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3855346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics. Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of results and function of the masticatory system in patients treated with the Herren type of activator. Madone G; Ingervall B Eur J Orthod; 1984 May; 6(2):92-106. PubMed ID: 6587974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of three appliance systems in the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Kerr WJ; Tenhave TR Eur J Orthod; 1988 Aug; 10(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 3181299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of on the incisor teeth of activator treatment: a follow-up study. Mörndal O Br J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 11(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 6594163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment. An implant study. Williams S; Melsen B Am J Orthod; 1982 Apr; 81(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 6960720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of continuous bite jumping with the Herbst appliance on the masticatory system: a functional analysis of treated class II malocclusions. Pancherz H; Anehus-Pancherz M Eur J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 4(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 6950902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study. Martin J; Pancherz H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minor tooth movement for crowded mandibular teeth. Davidowitz G Dent Today; 2007 Aug; 26(8):114, 116. PubMed ID: 17847910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical application of the Fränkel appliance. Case reports. Owen AH Angle Orthod; 1983 Jan; 53(1):29-88. PubMed ID: 6573864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]