207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31647166)
1. Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Klotz L
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):346-354. PubMed ID: 31647166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active surveillance in intermediate risk prostate cancer.
Chandrasekar T; Herrera-Caceres JO; Klotz L
Arch Esp Urol; 2019 Mar; 72(2):157-166. PubMed ID: 30855017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Berglund A; Stattin P
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1742-9. PubMed ID: 23727309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Voss J; Pal R; Ahmed S; Hannah M; Jaulim A; Walton T
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):863-870. PubMed ID: 29239082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Suitable for Active Surveillance.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Bratt O; Robinson D; Stattin P
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):292-299. PubMed ID: 30240688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy.
Sartor AO; Hricak H; Wheeler TM; Coleman J; Penson DF; Carroll PR; Rubin MA; Scardino PT
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6 Suppl):S12-24. PubMed ID: 19095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.
Prescrire Int; 2012 Oct; 21(131):242-8. PubMed ID: 23185849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining 'progression' and triggers for curative intervention during active surveillance.
Klotz L
Curr Opin Urol; 2015 May; 25(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 25714238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Survival Outcomes in the Sunnybrook Experience.
Musunuru HB; Yamamoto T; Klotz L; Ghanem G; Mamedov A; Sethukavalan P; Jethava V; Jain S; Zhang L; Vesprini D; Loblaw A
J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1651-1658. PubMed ID: 27569437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Active surveillance in favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer: outstanding questions and controversies.
Russell JR; Siddiqui MM
Curr Opin Oncol; 2022 May; 34(3):219-227. PubMed ID: 35266907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Klotz L
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 Apr; 16(4):24. PubMed ID: 25764118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining Prostate Cancer at Favorable Intermediate Risk: The Potential Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Genomic Tests.
Falagario UG; Beksac AT; Martini A; Cumarasamy S; Gupta A; Prasad S; Thulasidass H; Shah QN; Jayaratna I; Lewis S; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Tewari AK
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30730408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.
Reese AC; Landis P; Han M; Epstein JI; Carter HB
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2033-8. PubMed ID: 23680308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.
Sathianathen NJ; Konety BR; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Kuntz KM
Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 30425010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Clinical Utility of the Genomic Prostate Score in Men with Very Low to Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Gaffney C; Golan R; Cantu MD; Scognamiglio T; McCarthy H; Mosquera JM; McClure TD; Barbieri CE; Robinson BD; Khani F
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 30933552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: yes, but for whom?
Overland MR; Washington SL; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Herlemann A
Curr Opin Urol; 2019 Nov; 29(6):605-611. PubMed ID: 31436567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selecting men diagnosed with prostate cancer for active surveillance using a risk calculator: a prospective impact study.
van Vugt HA; Roobol MJ; van der Poel HG; van Muilekom EH; Busstra M; Kil P; Oomens EH; Leliveld A; Bangma CH; Korfage I; Steyerberg EW
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 22112199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
