These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31647252)

  • 1. Effects of deletion neighbourhood frequency and individual differences in lexical decision, progressive demasking, and naming.
    Dujardin E; Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Jun; 74(2):111-124. PubMed ID: 31647252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
    Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming.
    Andrews S; Lo S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 21875252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming.
    Andrews S; Hersch J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 20438253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.
    Perea M; Carreiras M; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1090-102. PubMed ID: 15813492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of orthographic and emotional neighbourhood in a colour categorization task.
    Camblats AM; Mathey S
    Cogn Process; 2016 Feb; 17(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 26553271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can response congruency effects be obtained in masked priming lexical decision?
    Fernández-López M; Marcet A; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1683-1702. PubMed ID: 30359052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical decision in children: sublexical processing or lexical search?
    van den Boer M; de Jong PF; Haentjens-van Meeteren MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1214-28. PubMed ID: 22489669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons.
    Carreiras M; Perea M; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jul; 23(4):857-71. PubMed ID: 9231433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age and word frequency on Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from a web-based large-scale lexical-decision task.
    Baek H; Gordon PC; Choi W
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 38236269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming.
    Lacruz I; Folk J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1261-84. PubMed ID: 15513246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.
    Lewellen MJ; Goldinger SD; Pisoni DB; Greene BG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1993 Sep; 122(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 8371087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shared lexical access processes in speaking and listening? An individual differences study.
    Hintz F; Jongman SR; Dijkhuis M; van 't Hoff V; McQueen JM; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1048-1063. PubMed ID: 31599623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in automatic semantic priming.
    Andrews S; Lo S; Xia V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):1025-1039. PubMed ID: 28263630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition.
    Ferrand L; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 12745841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.