These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31647252)

  • 21. The orthographic neighbourhood frequency effect in French: a letter-case manipulation study.
    Mathey S; Zagar D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Jun; 60(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 17133890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexical competition influences correct and incorrect visual word recognition.
    Gregg J; Inhoff AW; Li X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 May; 76(5):1011-1025. PubMed ID: 35543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?
    Burt JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1019-38. PubMed ID: 12421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reading and lexicalization in opaque and transparent orthographies: Word naming and word learning in English and Spanish.
    Kwok RK; Cuetos F; Avdyli R; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2105-2129. PubMed ID: 27609455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: evidence from chronolex.
    Ferrand L; Brysbaert M; Keuleers E; New B; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; Pallier C
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():306. PubMed ID: 22053160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways?
    Bonin P; Méot A; Lagarrigue A; Roux S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1268-94. PubMed ID: 25338284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Bouamama S; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):934-954. PubMed ID: 30247050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual word learning in skilled readers of English.
    Kwok RK; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):326-49. PubMed ID: 25019273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.
    Colombo L; Pasini M; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision.
    Morrison CM; Ellis AW
    Br J Psychol; 2000 May; 91 ( Pt 2)():167-80. PubMed ID: 10832512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The sandwich priming paradigm does not reduce lexical competitor effects.
    Trifonova IV; Adelman JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1743-1764. PubMed ID: 29389186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Length effect in reading and lexical decision: evidence from skilled readers and a developmental dyslexic participant.
    Juphard A; Carbonnel S; Valdois S
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 15177808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The attentional control of lexical processing pathways: reversing the word frequency effect.
    Balota DA; Law MB; Zevin JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1081-9. PubMed ID: 11126932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A multitask comparison of word- and character-frequency effects in Chinese reading.
    Xiong J; Yu L; Veldre A; Reichle ED; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 36326651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term priming of neighbours biases the word recognition process: evidence from a lexical decision task.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Raaijmakers JG
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Dec; 60(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 17285875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.