These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31648021)

  • 1. Neither wrong nor right: Theta and delta power increase during performance monitoring under conditions of uncertainty.
    Sandre A; Weinberg A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():225-239. PubMed ID: 31648021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A functional classification of medial frontal negativity ERPs: Theta oscillations and single subject effects.
    Van Noordt SJ; Campopiano A; Segalowitz SJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Sep; 53(9):1317-34. PubMed ID: 27338558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensions of anxiety and depression and neurophysiological indicators of error-monitoring: Relationship with delta and theta oscillatory power and error-related negativity amplitude.
    Muir AM; Hedges-Muncy A; Clawson A; Carbine KA; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13595. PubMed ID: 32412146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural oscillatory responses to performance monitoring differ between high- and low-impulsive individuals, but are unaffected by TMS.
    Barth B; Rohe T; Deppermann S; Fallgatter AJ; Ehlis AC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jun; 42(8):2416-2433. PubMed ID: 33605509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrasting time and frequency domains: ERN and induced theta oscillations differentially predict post-error behavior.
    Beatty PJ; Buzzell GA; Roberts DM; McDonald CG
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 20(3):636-647. PubMed ID: 32303991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced P300 in depression: Evidence from a flanker task and impact on ERN, CRN, and Pe.
    Klawohn J; Santopetro NJ; Meyer A; Hajcak G
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13520. PubMed ID: 31898810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disentangling associations between impulsivity, compulsivity, and performance monitoring.
    Overmeyer R; Endrass T
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jun; 61(6):e14539. PubMed ID: 38332720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic low frequency EEG phase synchronization patterns during proactive control of task switching.
    López ME; Pusil S; Pereda E; Maestú F; Barceló F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():70-82. PubMed ID: 30394328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrocortical measures of performance monitoring from go/no-go and flanker tasks: Differential relations with trait dimensions of the triarchic model of psychopathy.
    Ribes-Guardiola P; Poy R; Patrick CJ; Moltó J
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Jun; 57(6):e13573. PubMed ID: 32237155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No intolerance of errors: The effect of intolerance of uncertainty on performance monitoring revisited.
    Malbec M; Hindmarsh JN; Jongerling J; Franken IH; Wieser MJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Sep; 179():77-88. PubMed ID: 35835330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance monitoring in obsessive-compulsive undergraduates: Effects of task difficulty.
    Riesel A; Richter A; Kaufmann C; Kathmann N; Endrass T
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Aug; 98():35-42. PubMed ID: 26057081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theta- and delta-band EEG network dynamics during a novelty oddball task.
    Harper J; Malone SM; Iacono WG
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Nov; 54(11):1590-1605. PubMed ID: 28580687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive control is quickly adapted to actual task requirements despite misleading context cues-Evidence from the N2, CRN, and ERN.
    Grützmann R; Kathmann N; Heinzel S
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Feb; 59(2):e13961. PubMed ID: 34713905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient but less active monitoring system in individuals with high aggressive predispositions.
    Grisetto F; Delevoye-Turrell YN; Roger C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():125-132. PubMed ID: 31669317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overactive performance monitoring in obsessive-compulsive disorder: ERP evidence from correct and erroneous reactions.
    Endrass T; Klawohn J; Schuster F; Kathmann N
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1877-87. PubMed ID: 18514679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of error monitoring in obsessive-compulsive disorder by individually tailored symptom provocation.
    Roh D; Chang JG; Yoo SW; Shin J; Kim CH
    Psychol Med; 2017 Sep; 47(12):2071-2080. PubMed ID: 28374659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Error-monitoring across social and affective processing contexts.
    Suzuki T; Ait Oumeziane B; Novak K; Samuel DB; Foti D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Apr; 150():37-49. PubMed ID: 32004658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus processing and error monitoring in more-able kindergarteners with autism spectrum disorder: a short review and a preliminary Event-Related Potentials study.
    Kim SH; Grammer J; Benrey N; Morrison F; Lord C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 47(6):556-567. PubMed ID: 28394438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERP correlates of performance monitoring in elderly.
    Schreiber M; Pietschmann M; Kathmann N; Endrass T
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun; 76(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 21371802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intolerance of uncertainty, depression and the error-related negativity.
    Ruchensky JR; Bauer EA; MacNamara A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():45-52. PubMed ID: 32330538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.