These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31648286)
1. Comparison of 4D Flow MRI to 2D Flow MRI in the pulmonary arteries in healthy volunteers and patients with pulmonary hypertension. Sieren MM; Berlin C; Oechtering TH; Hunold P; Drömann D; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224121. PubMed ID: 31648286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics. Bollache E; van Ooij P; Powell A; Carr J; Markl M; Barker AJ Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1529-41. PubMed ID: 27435230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding. Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation. Frydrychowicz A; Wieben O; Niespodzany E; Reeder SB; Johnson KM; François CJ Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):819-25. PubMed ID: 23857136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of hepatic arterial hemodynamics with 4D flow MRI: in vitro analysis of motion and spatial resolution related error and in vivo feasibility study in 20 volunteers. Dimov IP; Tous C; Li N; Barat M; Bomberna T; Debbaut C; Jin N; Moran G; Tang A; Soulez G Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8639-8648. PubMed ID: 35731288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic pulse wave velocity measurements with undersampled 4D flow-sensitive MRI: comparison with 2D and algorithm determination. Wentland AL; Wieben O; François CJ; Boncyk C; Munoz Del Rio A; Johnson KM; Grist TM; Frydrychowicz A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Apr; 37(4):853-9. PubMed ID: 23124585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability of 4D flow parameters when subjected to changes in MRI acquisition parameters using a realistic thoracic aortic phantom. Montalba C; Urbina J; Sotelo J; Andia ME; Tejos C; Irarrazaval P; Hurtado DE; Valverde I; Uribe S Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):1882-1892. PubMed ID: 28714282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-scan and scan-rescan assessment of LV in- and outflow volumes by 4D flow MRI versus 2D planimetry. Kamphuis VP; van der Palen RLF; de Koning PJH; Elbaz MSM; van der Geest RJ; de Roos A; Roest AAW; Westenberg JJM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):511-522. PubMed ID: 28640394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of principal component analysis acceleration factor on velocity measurement in 2D and 4D PC-MRI. Pagé G; Bettoni J; Salsac AV; Balédent O MAGMA; 2018 Jun; 31(3):469-481. PubMed ID: 29357015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative Analysis of Vortical Blood Flow in the Thoracic Aorta Using 4D Phase Contrast MRI. von Spiczak J; Crelier G; Giese D; Kozerke S; Maintz D; Bunck AC PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139025. PubMed ID: 26418327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined free-running four-dimensional anatomical and flow magnetic resonance imaging with native contrast using Synchronization of Neighboring Acquisitions by Physiological Signals. Falcão MBL; Mackowiak ALC; Rossi GMC; Prša M; Tenisch E; Rumac S; Bacher M; Rutz T; van Heeswijk RB; Speier P; Markl M; Bastiaansen JAM; Stuber M; Roy CW J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024; 26(1):101006. PubMed ID: 38309581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]