These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3164923)
1. The transfusion committee: riding shotgun for the patient. Myhre BA Tex Med; 1988 Jun; 84(6):31-4. PubMed ID: 3164923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical staff monitoring functions: medical record review. JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10289639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Achieving better blood bank QA with a transfusion form. Scholten R MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Oct; 21(10):41-3, 46. PubMed ID: 10295651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Blood usage review: a common source of noncompliance. Affeldt JE Hospitals; 1984 Oct; 58(20):131. PubMed ID: 6592137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical record review for clinical pertinence. Schraffenberger LA J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):43-50. PubMed ID: 10292964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Principles of blood transfusion service audit. Dosunmu AO; Dada MO Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 16752664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical record review for clinical pertinence. Lewis KS Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10112162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review? Spath PL J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corrections to standards and elements of performance. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Dec; 24(12):6-8. PubMed ID: 16519365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tissue oversight in hospitals: the role of the transfusion services. Hillyer CD; Josephson CD Transfusion; 2007 Feb; 47(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 17302760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical approaches to improve laboratory performance and transfusion safety. Galel SA; Richards CA Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4 Suppl 1):S43-9. PubMed ID: 9124229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical staff: what should trigger a focused review? Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Oct; 32(10):137-8, 143. PubMed ID: 17957881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. PEP: an explanation of the JCAH's performance and evaluation procedure for auditing and improving patient care. Jacobs CM; Christoffel T Investor Owned Hosp Rev; 1975; 8(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10289157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital survey process changes in 2000. Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11009951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Transfusion commission and service recommendations for increasing efficiency in transfusion medicine]. Kluge A; Hitzler W Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():431-5. PubMed ID: 1703893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review in the university hospital setting. Wirtschafter DD Ala J Med Sci; 1986 Jan; 23(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 3456729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]