These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3164923)

  • 1. The transfusion committee: riding shotgun for the patient.
    Myhre BA
    Tex Med; 1988 Jun; 84(6):31-4. PubMed ID: 3164923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical staff monitoring functions: medical record review.
    JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10289639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achieving better blood bank QA with a transfusion form.
    Scholten R
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Oct; 21(10):41-3, 46. PubMed ID: 10295651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blood usage review: a common source of noncompliance.
    Affeldt JE
    Hospitals; 1984 Oct; 58(20):131. PubMed ID: 6592137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
    Schraffenberger LA
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):43-50. PubMed ID: 10292964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principles of blood transfusion service audit.
    Dosunmu AO; Dada MO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 16752664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical issues in tissue banking.
    Haimowitz MD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4 Suppl 1):S75-81. PubMed ID: 9124234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
    Lewis KS
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10112162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for the review of transfusion practices.
    Silberstein LE; Kruskall MS; Stehling LC; Johnston MF; Rutman RC; Samia CT; Ramsey G; Eisenstaedt RS
    JAMA; 1989 Oct; 262(14):1993-7. PubMed ID: 2506369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review?
    Spath PL
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical pertinence review.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10295774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corrections to standards and elements of performance.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Dec; 24(12):6-8. PubMed ID: 16519365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue oversight in hospitals: the role of the transfusion services.
    Hillyer CD; Josephson CD
    Transfusion; 2007 Feb; 47(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 17302760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical approaches to improve laboratory performance and transfusion safety.
    Galel SA; Richards CA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4 Suppl 1):S43-9. PubMed ID: 9124229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical staff: what should trigger a focused review?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Oct; 32(10):137-8, 143. PubMed ID: 17957881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PEP: an explanation of the JCAH's performance and evaluation procedure for auditing and improving patient care.
    Jacobs CM; Christoffel T
    Investor Owned Hosp Rev; 1975; 8(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10289157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospital survey process changes in 2000.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11009951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Transfusion commission and service recommendations for increasing efficiency in transfusion medicine].
    Kluge A; Hitzler W
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():431-5. PubMed ID: 1703893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review in the university hospital setting.
    Wirtschafter DD
    Ala J Med Sci; 1986 Jan; 23(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 3456729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical staff monitoring functions: departmental review.
    JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(6):5-8. PubMed ID: 10289683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.