189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31649445)
1. Correlation between abutment angulation and off-axial stresses on biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconium implants in the anterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Guguloth H; Duggineni CR; Chitturi RK; Sujesh M; Ravvali T; Amiti RR
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(4):353-361. PubMed ID: 31649445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior implants associated with titanium and zirconia abutments and monotype zirconia implants.
Brandão de Holanda KA; Armini Caldas R; Amaral M; da Silva Concilio LR; Pino Vitti R
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Feb; 65(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 32938877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental implant and abutment in PEEK: stress assessment in single crown retainers on anterior region.
de Almeida MVR; Ribeiro MCO; Dos Reis-Neta GR; Vargas-Moreno VF; Gomes RS; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Marcello-Machado RM
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):336. PubMed ID: 38795258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress distribution and microgap formation in angulated zirconia abutments with a titanium base in narrow diameter implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
Zhang Y; Yu P; Yu H
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 38(7):e3610. PubMed ID: 35490303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Pumnil S; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Elsaka S
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):e2-e11. PubMed ID: 35505638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture strength study of internally connected zirconia abutments reinforced with titanium inserts.
Chun HJ; Yeo IS; Lee JH; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Han JS; Lee SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):346-50. PubMed ID: 25830395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Network meta-analysis of survival rate and complications in implant-supported single crowns with different abutment materials.
Hu M; Chen J; Pei X; Han J; Wang J
J Dent; 2019 Sep; 88():103115. PubMed ID: 30986515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis of Standard- and Narrow-Diameter Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Sahin SC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):e58-e68. PubMed ID: 32724919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Korkmaz IH; Kul E
J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 34859942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load.
Uppalapati V; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Bhat I; Munaganti J; Khan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 37189007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental evaluation of stress distribution with narrow diameter implants: A finite element analysis.
Cinel S; Celik E; Sagirkaya E; Sahin O
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):417-425. PubMed ID: 28645665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biofilm and saliva affect the biomechanical behavior of dental implants.
Bordin D; Cavalcanti IM; Jardim Pimentel M; Fortulan CA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; da Silva WJ
J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):997-1002. PubMed ID: 25711169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wear and Corrosion Interactions at the Titanium/Zirconia Interface: Dental Implant Application.
Sikora CL; Alfaro MF; Yuan JC; Barao VA; Sukotjo C; Mathew MT
J Prosthodont; 2018 Dec; 27(9):842-852. PubMed ID: 29521461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of anterior fixed partial denture supported by implants with different materials.
Xie B; Chen J; Zhao T; Shen J; Dörsam I; He Y
Ann Anat; 2022 Aug; 243():151943. PubMed ID: 35378254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
