912 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31651312)
1. Effect of lordosis on adjacent levels after lumbar interbody fusion, before and after removal of the spinal fixator: a finite element analysis.
Tsuang FY; Tsai JC; Lai DM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):470. PubMed ID: 31651312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal of fixation construct could mitigate adjacent segment stress after lumbosacral fusion: A finite element analysis.
Hsieh YY; Chen CH; Tsuang FY; Wu LC; Lin SC; Chiang CJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Mar; 43():115-120. PubMed ID: 28259005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Changes of Adjacent and Fixed Segments Through Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation versus Traditional Trajectory Screw Fixation in the Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Analysis.
Zhang L; Li HM; Zhang R; Zhang H; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e447-e456. PubMed ID: 33895371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of four surgical scenarios of lumbar fusion with hyperlordotic interbody cage: A finite element study.
Zhang Z; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Sun Y; Sun X; Liu W
Biomed Mater Eng; 2018; 29(4):485-497. PubMed ID: 30282345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical advantages of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with freehand technique in a prospective randomized controlled trial-perspective for patient-specific finite element analysis.
Kim HJ; Kang KT; Park SC; Kwon OH; Son J; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS; Lenke LG
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):671-680. PubMed ID: 27867080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws' insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in 1 segment lumbar fusion.
Kim HJ; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Moon SH; Kim HS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim BR; Sohn JS; Ko YN; Lee HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):1637-44. PubMed ID: 22089393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oblique lateral interbody fusion with internal fixations in the treatment for cross-segment degenerative lumbar spine disease (L2-3 and L4-5) finite element analysis.
Zhang S; Zhang Y; Huang L; Zhang S; Lu C; Liu Z; Kang C; Wang Z
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17116. PubMed ID: 37816744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical changes of degenerated adjacent segment and intact lumbar spine after lumbosacral topping-off surgery: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Cao L; Liu Y; Mei W; Xu J; Zhan S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 32061252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of extreme lateral interbody fusion with different internal fixation methods: a finite element analysis.
Li XH; She LJ; Zhang W; Cheng XD; Fan JP
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Feb; 23(1):134. PubMed ID: 35139843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Interbody Fusion on the Remaining Discs of the Lumbar Spine in Subjects with Disc Degeneration.
Ryu R; Techy F; Varadarajan R; Amirouche F
Orthop Surg; 2016 Feb; 8(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 27028378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element biomechanical analysis of 3D printed intervertebral fusion cage in osteoporotic population.
Wu J; Miao J; Chen G; Xu H; Wen W; Xu H; Liu L
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):129. PubMed ID: 38347518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does oblique lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease: A finite element analysis.
Du CF; Cai XY; Gui W; Sun MS; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Zhang CQ; Huang YP
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jan; 128():104122. PubMed ID: 33248365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a finite element analysis.
Fan Y; Zhou S; Xie T; Yu Z; Han X; Zhu L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 14(1):476. PubMed ID: 31888664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
