142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31652288)
1. Circulating cell-free DNA from plasma undergoes less fragmentation during bisulfite treatment than genomic DNA due to low molecular weight.
Werner B; Yuwono NL; Henry C; Gunther K; Rapkins RW; Ford CE; Warton K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224338. PubMed ID: 31652288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of 12 different kits for bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free DNA.
Worm Ørntoft MB; Jensen SØ; Hansen TB; Bramsen JB; Andersen CL
Epigenetics; 2017 Aug; 12(8):626-636. PubMed ID: 28557629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood.
Kresse SH; Brandt-Winge S; Pharo H; Flatin BTB; Jeanmougin M; Vedeld HM; Lind GE
Clin Epigenetics; 2023 Sep; 15(1):151. PubMed ID: 37710283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bisulfite kits for DNA methylation profiling in terms of DNA fragmentation and DNA recovery using digital PCR.
Kint S; De Spiegelaere W; De Kesel J; Vandekerckhove L; Van Criekinge W
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199091. PubMed ID: 29902267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance evaluation of kits for bisulfite-conversion of DNA from tissues, cell lines, FFPE tissues, aspirates, lavages, effusions, plasma, serum, and urine.
Holmes EE; Jung M; Meller S; Leisse A; Sailer V; Zech J; Mengdehl M; Garbe LA; Uhl B; Kristiansen G; Dietrich D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93933. PubMed ID: 24699908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.
Leontiou CA; Hadjidaniel MD; Mina P; Antoniou P; Ioannides M; Patsalis PC
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135058. PubMed ID: 26247357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA Methylation Analysis of Free-Circulating DNA in Body Fluids.
Jung M; Kristiansen G; Dietrich D
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1708():621-641. PubMed ID: 29224167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR: A Simple Method for Studying Epigenetic Modifications of Cell-Free DNA.
Sigalotti L; Covre A; Colizzi F; Fratta E
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1909():137-162. PubMed ID: 30580429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma.
Warton K; Graham LJ; Yuwono N; Samimi G
Cancer Genet; 2018 Dec; 228-229():143-150. PubMed ID: 29567030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An optimized rapid bisulfite conversion method with high recovery of cell-free DNA.
Yi S; Long F; Cheng J; Huang D
BMC Mol Biol; 2017 Dec; 18(1):24. PubMed ID: 29258436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling clinical DNA fragmentation in the development of universal PCR-based assays for bisulfite-converted, formalin-fixed and cell-free DNA sample analysis.
Johnston AD; Lu J; Korbie D; Trau M
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16051. PubMed ID: 36163372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bisulfite-Converted DNA Quantity Evaluation: A Multiplex Quantitative Real-Time PCR System for Evaluation of Bisulfite Conversion.
Hong SR; Shin KJ
Front Genet; 2021; 12():618955. PubMed ID: 33719336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Formamide as a denaturant for bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA: Bisulfite sequencing of the GSTPi and RARbeta2 genes of 43 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostate cancer specimens.
Zon G; Barker MA; Kaur P; Groshen S; Jones LW; Imam SA; Boyd VL
Anal Biochem; 2009 Sep; 392(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 19505431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Synthetic DNA Construct to Evaluate the Recovery Efficiency of Cell-Free DNA Extraction and Bisulfite Modification.
Goh SK; Cox DRA; Wong BKL; Musafer A; Witkowski T; Do H; Muralidharan V; Dobrovic A
Clin Chem; 2021 Sep; 67(9):1201-1209. PubMed ID: 34151944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preparation of genome-wide DNA fragment libraries using bisulfite in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis slices with formamide denaturation and quality control for massively parallel sequencing by oligonucleotide ligation and detection.
Ranade SS; Chung CB; Zon G; Boyd VL
Anal Biochem; 2009 Jul; 390(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 19379703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The method of estimating bisulfite conversion rate in DNA methylation analysis.
Liu YY; Cui HM
Yi Chuan; 2015 Sep; 37(9):939-44. PubMed ID: 26399534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole genome bisulfite sequencing of cell-free DNA and its cellular contributors uncovers placenta hypomethylated domains.
Jensen TJ; Kim SK; Zhu Z; Chin C; Gebhard C; Lu T; Deciu C; van den Boom D; Ehrich M
Genome Biol; 2015 Apr; 16(1):78. PubMed ID: 25886572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative and multiplexed DNA methylation analysis using long-read single-molecule real-time bisulfite sequencing (SMRT-BS).
Yang Y; Sebra R; Pullman BS; Qiao W; Peter I; Desnick RJ; Geyer CR; DeCoteau JF; Scott SA
BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):350. PubMed ID: 25943404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-speed conversion of cytosine to uracil in bisulfite genomic sequencing analysis of DNA methylation.
Shiraishi M; Hayatsu H
DNA Res; 2004 Dec; 11(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 15871463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole genome amplification of sodium bisulfite-treated DNA allows the accurate estimate of methylated cytosine density in limited DNA resources.
Mill J; Yazdanpanah S; Gückel E; Ziegler S; Kaminsky Z; Petronis A
Biotechniques; 2006 Nov; 41(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 17140118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
