573 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31653399)
1. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting.
Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers?
Deeb GR; Allen RK; Hall VP; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Bencharit S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trephination-based, guided surgical implant placement: A clinical study.
Suriyan N; Sarinnaphakorn L; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):411-416. PubMed ID: 30503150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides.
D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.
Adams CR; Ammoun R; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 35257456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
Schneider D; Sancho-Puchades M; Mir-Marí J; Mühlemann S; Jung R; Hämmerle C
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deviation of dental implants placed using a novel 3D-printed surgical guide: An in vitro study.
Etajuri EA; Suliman E; Mahmood WAA; Ibrahim N; Buzayan M; Mohd NR
Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):359-362. PubMed ID: 33448161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 3D displacements of screw-retained zirconia implant crowns into implants with different internal connections with respect to screw tightening.
Rebeeah HA; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy E; Clelland N; Brantley W
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 28478991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery.
Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides.
Cunha RM; Souza FÁ; Hadad H; Poli PP; Maiorana C; Carvalho PSP
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
