These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31653400)
21. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns. Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Kim MJ; Hsu SM; Abdulhameed N; Jenkins R; Neal D; Ren F; Clark AE J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():19-27. PubMed ID: 29042241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative evaluation of enamel wear against monolithic zirconia and layered zirconia after polishing and glazing: An Shaik K; Reddy KM; Shastry YM; Aditya SV; Babu PJK J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):354-360. PubMed ID: 36511069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Preis V; Weiser F; Handel G; Rosentritt M Quintessence Int; 2013 May; 44(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 23479579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Wear Behavior of Graded Glass/Zirconia Crowns and Their Antagonists. Kaizer MR; Bano S; Borba M; Garg V; Dos Santos MBF; Zhang Y J Dent Res; 2019 Apr; 98(4):437-442. PubMed ID: 30744472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: Contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. Stawarczyk B; Frevert K; Ender A; Roos M; Sener B; Wimmer T J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():128-138. PubMed ID: 26751707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Enamel wear opposing polished and aged zirconia. Burgess JO; Janyavula S; Lawson NC; Lucas TJ; Cakir D Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 23848069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Wear of monolithic zirconia against different CAD-CAM and indirect restorative materials. Ozkir SE; Bicer M; Deste G; Karakus E; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 34059295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Wear of various restorative materials against 5Y-ZP zirconia. Jia-Mahasap W; Jitwirachot K; Holloway JA; Rangsri W; Rungsiyakull P J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):814.e1-814.e10. PubMed ID: 36089544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. Preis V; Behr M; Handel G; Schneider-Feyrer S; Hahnel S; Rosentritt M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jun; 10():13-22. PubMed ID: 22520415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of enamel and material wear by digital microscope: an in-vitro study. Habib SR; Ansari AS; Alqahtani M; Alshiddi IF; Alqahtani AS; Hassan SH Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e121. PubMed ID: 31939500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cycle-dependent in vitro wear performance of dental ceramics after clinical surface treatments. Preis V; Grumser K; Schneider-Feyrer S; Behr M; Rosentritt M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():49-58. PubMed ID: 26313248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. Ucar Y; Akova T; Akyil MS; Brantley WA J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 19782828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of Combined Surface Treatments on Surface Roughness and Resin Bond Strength to Y-TZP Ceramic and Nickel-Chromium Metal Alloy. Sayin Ozel G; Okutan Y; Oguz Ahmet BS; Ozdere E Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2019 Jul; 37(7):442-450. PubMed ID: 31265379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of sintering speed, aging processes, and different surface treatments on the optical and surface properties of monolithic zirconia restorations. Hafezeqoran A; Sabanik P; Koodaryan R; Ghalili KM J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):917-926. PubMed ID: 35109985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The abrasive effect of a porcelain and a nickel-chromium alloy on the wear of human enamel and the influence of a carbonated beverage on the rate of wear. Joshi N; Patil NP; Patil SB J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 20113396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains. Preis V; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Hahnel S; Handel G; Rosentritt M Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 21524788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The progressive wear and abrasiveness of novel graded glass/zirconia materials relative to their dental ceramic counterparts. Kaizer MR; Moraes RR; Cava SS; Zhang Y Dent Mater; 2019 May; 35(5):763-771. PubMed ID: 30827797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. Kim MJ; Oh SH; Kim JH; Ju SW; Seo DG; Jun SH; Ahn JS; Ryu JJ J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):979-88. PubMed ID: 22892464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Two-body wear test of enamel against laboratory polished and clinically adjusted zirconia. Mehzabeen KR; Boughton P; Kan WH; Ruys AJ; Guazzato M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 108():103760. PubMed ID: 32469712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]