These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31653884)

  • 1. Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes.
    Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Zhao D; Ren S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15379. PubMed ID: 31653884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes.
    Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Gu Y; Song P; Zhang B; Zhao D; Pang C; Ren S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5676. PubMed ID: 32231236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes.
    Miao YY; Ma XM; Qu ZX; Eliasy A; Wu BW; Xu H; Wang P; Zheng XB; Wang JJ; Ye YF; Chen SH; Elsheikh A; Bao FJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 258():196-207. PubMed ID: 37879454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
    Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Li Y; Tian L; Guo LL; Hao Y; Jie Y
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():863240. PubMed ID: 35497328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of new Corvis ST parameters for detecting subclinical and clinical keratoconus eyes in a Chinese population.
    Ren S; Xu L; Fan Q; Gu Y; Yang K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):4962. PubMed ID: 33654120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer.
    Ali NQ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3651-9. PubMed ID: 24833745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal biomechanics in normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes.
    Peyman A; Sepahvand F; Pourazizi M; Noorshargh P; Forouhari A
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):459. PubMed ID: 37968616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal deformation response parameters of dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
    Herber R; Vinciguerra R; Lopes B; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 32050237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes Using a Non-contact Tonometer With a Dynamic Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera.
    Mercer RN; Waring GO; Roberts CJ; Jhanji V; Wang Y; Filho JS; Hemings RA; Rocha KM
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 28880338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness measured by Corvis ST and UHR-OCT in keratoconus and normal eyes.
    Li Y; Xu Z; Liu Q; Wang Y; Lin K; Xia J; Chen S; Hu L
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2021 Jan; 8(1):2. PubMed ID: 33419485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal deformation amplitude analysis for keratoconus detection through compensation for intraocular pressure and integration with horizontal thickness profile.
    Leão E; Ing Ren T; Lyra JM; Machado A; Koprowski R; Lopes B; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Krysik K; Ambrósio R
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():263-271. PubMed ID: 31096090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability and correlation of corneal biomechanical measurements obtained by Corvis ST in orthokeratology patients.
    Lu W; Ding W; Ji R; Tian Y; Zhao C; Li H; Jiao M; Guo Z; Leng L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2023 Jun; 46(3):101793. PubMed ID: 36509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.
    Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A; Roberts CJ; Lopes B; Morenghi E; Azzolini C; Vinciguerra P
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):803-810. PubMed ID: 27930790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Cataract Surgery.
    Hirasawa K; Nakakura S; Nakao Y; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Murata H; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 195():26-35. PubMed ID: 30071213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between Corneal Stiffness Parameter at the First Applanation and Keratoconus Severity.
    Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Ren S
    J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():6667507. PubMed ID: 33343935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus.
    Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
    Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.