These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31654698)

  • 1. Encoding focus does not affect recollection of action memories: Event related potential (ERP) and modeling evidence.
    Nardini CL; Leynes PA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jan; 147():9-17. PubMed ID: 31654698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoding focus alters diagnostic recollection and event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Leynes PA; Mok BA
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Oct; 117():1-11. PubMed ID: 28683338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence that encoding focus alters recollected features.
    Leynes PA; Crawford CJ
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Nov; 127():42-50. PubMed ID: 30253265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact.
    Addante RJ; Ranganath C; Olichney J; Yonelinas AP
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3004-14. PubMed ID: 22898646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the role of retrieval processes in the survival processing effect: Evidence from ROC and ERP analyses.
    Forester G; Kroneisen M; Erdfelder E; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2019 Dec; 166():107083. PubMed ID: 31491554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do word frequency and memory task influence directed forgetting: An ERP study.
    Ye J; Nie A; Liu S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():157-172. PubMed ID: 31655184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection.
    Addante RJ; Ranganath C; Yonelinas AP
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 22548808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sometimes we have to intentionally focus on the details: Incidental encoding and perceptual change decrease recognition memory performance and the ERP correlate of recollection.
    Haese A; Czernochowski D
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():1-11. PubMed ID: 25801188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of task-set adoption on ERP correlates of controlled and automatic recognition memory.
    Wilckens KA; Tremel JJ; Wolk DA; Wheeler ME
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1384-92. PubMed ID: 21211568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The late positive event-related potential component is time locked to the decision in recognition memory tasks.
    Sun J; Osth AF; Feuerriegel D
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():194-208. PubMed ID: 38796921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: an ERP perspective.
    Friedman D; de Chastelaine M; Nessler D; Malcolm B
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():124-41. PubMed ID: 19914220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is what goes in what comes out? Encoding and retrieval event-related potentials together determine memory outcome.
    Chen YY; Lithgow K; Hemmerich JA; Caplan JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 232(10):3175-90. PubMed ID: 24929938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of encoding focus and stereotypes on source monitoring event-related-potentials.
    Leynes PA; Nagovsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 1630():171-82. PubMed ID: 26604033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The electrophysiological correlates of recent and remote recollection.
    Roberts JS; Tsivilis D; Mayes AR
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2162-71. PubMed ID: 23906539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elaborately rehearsed information can be forgotten: A new paradigm to investigate directed forgetting.
    Gao H; Qi M; Zhang Q
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2019 Oct; 164():107063. PubMed ID: 31376463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related differences in subjective recollection: ERP studies of encoding and retrieval.
    Rollins L; Riggins T
    Dev Sci; 2018 May; 21(3):e12583. PubMed ID: 28677331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Redundancy effect of initial enactment encoding and subsequent testing on memory enhancement: Insights from an electrophysiological study.
    Cui X; Lu J; Liu Y; Li J; Zheng Z; Guo C
    Brain Res; 2024 Aug; 1836():148939. PubMed ID: 38621635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unitization mitigates interference by intrinsic negative emotion in familiarity and recollection of associative memory: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Han M; Mao X; Kartvelishvili N; Li W; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1259-1268. PubMed ID: 30225598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unitization does not impede overall item recognition performance: Behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Liu Z; Wu J; Wang Y; Guo C
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Jan; 167():107130. PubMed ID: 31786310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological evidence for context reinstatement effects on object recognition memory.
    Miao J; Weigl M; Kong N; Zhao MF; Mecklinger A; Zheng Z; Li J
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2023 Dec; 206():107861. PubMed ID: 37944637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.