151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31654738)
41. Assessment of Split Renal Function Using a Combination of Contrast-Enhanced CT and Serum Creatinine Values for Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation.
Shi W; Liang X; Wu N; Zhang H; Yuan X; Tan Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):142-147. PubMed ID: 32255686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Two non-invasive GFR-estimation methods in rat models of polycystic kidney disease: 3.0 Tesla dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and optical imaging.
Sadick M; Attenberger U; Kraenzlin B; Kayed H; Schoenberg SO; Gretz N; Schock-Kusch D
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Oct; 26(10):3101-8. PubMed ID: 21444361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Quantitative assessment of glomerular filtration rate with MR gadolinium slope clearance measurements: a phase I trial.
Boss A; Martirosian P; Gehrmann M; Artunc F; Risler T; Oesingmann N; Claussen CD; Schick F; Küper K; Schlemmer HP
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 17209166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements in renal cell carcinoma: effect of region of interest size and positioning on interobserver and intraobserver variability.
Braunagel M; Radler E; Ingrisch M; Staehler M; Schmid-Tannwald C; Rist C; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2015 Jan; 50(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 25260094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the accurate, extensive quantification of microvascular permeability in atherosclerotic plaques.
Calcagno C; Lobatto ME; Dyvorne H; Robson PM; Millon A; Senders ML; Lairez O; Ramachandran S; Coolen BF; Black A; Mulder WJ; Fayad ZA
NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1304-14. PubMed ID: 26332103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Correlation Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Rectal Cancer.
Sun H; Xu Y; Xu Q; Duan J; Zhang H; Liu T; Li L; Chan Q; Xie S; Wang W
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e134-e140. PubMed ID: 30268719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality.
Morrison CK; Henze Bancroft LC; DeMartini WB; Holmes JH; Wang K; Bosca RJ; Korosec FR; Strigel RM
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):198-205. PubMed ID: 27898602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. MRI-measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model.
Sourbron SP; Michaely HJ; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 18097276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of pulmonary lesions using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging.
Chen L; Liu D; Zhang J; Xie B; Zhou X; Grimm R; Huang X; Wang J; Feng L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):459-468. PubMed ID: 29437281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Progression of experimental lesions of atherosclerosis: assessment by kinetic modeling of black-blood dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Chen H; Ricks J; Rosenfeld M; Kerwin WS
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jun; 69(6):1712-20. PubMed ID: 22829477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Wavelet-based segmentation of renal compartments in DCE-MRI of human kidney: initial results in patients and healthy volunteers.
Li S; Zöllner FG; Merrem AD; Peng Y; Roervik J; Lundervold A; Schad LR
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Mar; 36(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 21704499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The importance of AIF ROI selection in DCE-MRI renography: reproducibility and variability of renal perfusion and filtration.
Cutajar M; Mendichovszky IA; Tofts PS; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e154-60. PubMed ID: 19541441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumors: preclinical validation of parametric images.
Egeland TA; Simonsen TG; Gaustad JV; Gulliksrud K; Ellingsen C; Rofstad EK
Radiat Res; 2009 Sep; 172(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19708783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Optimal k-space sampling for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with an application to MR renography.
Song T; Laine AF; Chen Q; Rusinek H; Bokacheva L; Lim RP; Laub G; Kroeker R; Lee VS
Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1242-8. PubMed ID: 19230014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prediction and assessment of responses to renal artery revascularization with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study.
Lim SW; Chrysochou C; Buckley DL; Kalra PA; Sourbron SP
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol; 2013 Sep; 305(5):F672-8. PubMed ID: 23804449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. View-Sharing Artifact Reduction With Retrospective Compressed Sensing Reconstruction in the Context of Contrast-Enhanced Liver MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Screening.
Shaikh J; Stoddard PB; Levine EG; Roh AT; Saranathan M; Chang ST; Muelly MC; Hargreaves BA; Vasanawala SS; Loening AM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Apr; 49(4):984-993. PubMed ID: 30390358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Examination of self-navigating MR-sequences for perfusion imaging of the kidneys].
Lietzmann F; Zöllner FG; Michaely HJ; Schad LR
Z Med Phys; 2010; 20(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 20807690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Estimation of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate without exogenous contrast agent.
He X; Aghayev A; Gumus S; Ty Bae K
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Jan; 71(1):257-66. PubMed ID: 23468406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Estimation of differential renal function on routine abdominal imaging employing compressed-sensed contrast-enhanced MR: a feasibility study referenced against dynamic renal scintigraphy in patients with deteriorating renal retention parameters.
Schulze-Zachau V; Winkel DJ; Kaul F; Demerath T; Potthast S; Heye TJ; Boll DT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Apr; 48(4):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 36732406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
