149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3165508)
1. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs.
Underhill TE; Chilvarquer I; Kimura K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Preece JW; Barnwell G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jul; 66(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 3165508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part II. Cancer incidence and fatality.
Underhill TE; Kimura K; Chilvarquer I; McDavid WD; Langlais RP; Preece JW; Barnwell G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Aug; 66(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 3174060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between panoramic radiographic techniques. Part III: Radiation absorbed doses with Status-X, Orthopantomograph Model OP5, and Paneléte.
Stenstrom B; Julin P; Richter S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1982; 11(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 6962151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dosimetry in specific area radiography.
Brand JW; Kuba RK; Aeppli DM; Johnson JC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Mar; 67(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 2648245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
Freeman JP; Brand JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation absorbed doses at radiographic examination of third molars.
Rehnmark-Larsson S; Stenström B; Julin P; Richter S
Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(5):189-201. PubMed ID: 6960504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction of absorbed doses to the thyroid gland in orthodontic treatment planning by reducing the area of irradiation.
Svenson B; Sjöholm B; Jonsson B
Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 15506691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effectiveness of the thyroid shield in dental radiology.
Sikorski PA; Taylor KW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Aug; 58(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 6592516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exposure distribution, absorbed doses, and energy imparted for panoramic radiography using Orthopantomograph model OP 5.
Nilsson L; Rohlin M; Thapper K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 3856810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of body doses in rotational panoramic radiography by means of reduced beam width in combination with rare earth intensifying screens.
Aagaard A; Sewerin I
Scand J Dent Res; 1986 Dec; 94(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 3468601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
