These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31655449)

  • 1. Changes (but not differences) in motion direction fail to capture attention.
    Van der Burg E; Cass J; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():54-63. PubMed ID: 31655449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conflicting motion information impairs multiple object tracking.
    St Clair R; Huff M; Seiffert AE
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):18.1-13. PubMed ID: 20465337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):548-58. PubMed ID: 16132965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention modulates perception of transparent motion.
    Felisberti FM; Zanker JM
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2587-99. PubMed ID: 16022880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming of luminance-defined motion direction in visual search.
    Kristjánsson A; Bjarnason A; Hjaltason AB; Stefánsdóttir BG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1027-41. PubMed ID: 19525535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local motion effects on form in radial frequency patterns.
    Dickinson JE; Han L; Bell J; Badcock DR
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):20.1-15. PubMed ID: 20377297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness.
    Hesselmann G; Niedeggen M; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1048-56. PubMed ID: 16309728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and the motion aftereffect.
    Morgan MJ; Solomon JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2848-2864. PubMed ID: 31268409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of distractor elements on direction discrimination in random Gabor kinematograms.
    Bex PJ; Baker CL
    Vision Res; 1997 Jul; 37(13):1761-7. PubMed ID: 9274763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It is time to integrate: the temporal dynamics of object motion and texture motion integration in multiple object tracking.
    Huff M; Papenmeier F
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():25-30. PubMed ID: 23079637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of form cues on 1D and 2D motion pooling.
    Edwards M; Cassanello CR; Badcock DR; Nishida S
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():94-104. PubMed ID: 23131840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors.
    Retell JD; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1340-65. PubMed ID: 26299891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.
    Narasimhan S; Tripathy SP; Barrett BT
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 18930074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apparent position in depth of stationary moving three-dimensional objects.
    Tsui SY; Khuu SK; Hayes A
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 17069871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motion-induced position shifts in global dynamic Gabor arrays.
    Rider AT; McOwan PW; Johnston A
    J Vis; 2009 Dec; 9(13):8.1-8. PubMed ID: 20055541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A unique visual rhythm does not pop out.
    Li H; Bao Y; Pöppel E; Su YH
    Cogn Process; 2014 Feb; 15(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 24113914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by dynamic cues.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):111-27. PubMed ID: 25205064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unexpected changes in direction of motion attract attention.
    Howard CJ; Holcombe AO
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2087-95. PubMed ID: 21097853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.