202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31655513)
1. Radiographic comparison of cervical spine motion using LMA Fastrach, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Inan G; Bedirli N; Ozkose Satirlar Z
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Dec; 49(6):1681-1686. PubMed ID: 31655513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway-assisted Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation Is Associated With Reduced Cervical Spine Motion When Compared With C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy-guided Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Cross Over Trial.
Swain A; Bhagat H; Gupta V; Salunke P; Panda NB; Sahu S
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2020 Jul; 32(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 30893284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Video-assisted versus conventional tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients.
Dhonneur G; Abdi W; Ndoko SK; Amathieu R; Risk N; El Housseini L; Polliand C; Champault G; Combes X; Tual L
Obes Surg; 2009 Aug; 19(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18836785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes.
Malik MA; Subramaniam R; Churasia S; Maharaj CH; Harte BH; Laffey JG
Br J Anaesth; 2009 May; 102(5):654-61. PubMed ID: 19336535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
Paik H; Park HP
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Success of tracheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized trial of the LMA Fastrach and LMA CTrach.
Liu EH; Goy RW; Lim Y; Chen FG
Anesthesiology; 2008 Apr; 108(4):621-6. PubMed ID: 18362593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cervical spine motion during intubation with a C‑MAC D‑Blade® and an LMA Fastrach®.
Özkan D; Altınsoy S; Sayın M; Dolgun H; Ergil J; Dönmez A
Anaesthesist; 2019 Feb; 68(2):90-96. PubMed ID: 30627738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluoroscopic Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion Using LMA CTrach, C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope.
Şahin T; Arslan Zİ; Akansel G; Balaban O; Berk D; Solak M; Toker K
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2018 Feb; 46(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 30140500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury.
Watts AD; Gelb AW; Bach DB; Pelz DM
Anesthesiology; 1997 Dec; 87(6):1335-42. PubMed ID: 9416718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation using the Macintosh and Bullard laryngoscopes, the bonfils fibrescope and the intubating laryngeal mask airway.
Wahlen BM; Gercek E
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2004 Nov; 21(11):907-13. PubMed ID: 15717709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study.
Maruyama K; Yamada T; Kawakami R; Hara K
Br J Anaesth; 2008 Oct; 101(4):563-7. PubMed ID: 18660500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope.
Maruyama K; Yamada T; Kawakami R; Kamata T; Yokochi M; Hara K
Br J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 100(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18070787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Hirabayashi Y; Fujita A; Seo N; Sugimoto H
Anaesthesia; 2007 Oct; 62(10):1050-5. PubMed ID: 17845658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tracheal intubation and cervical spine excursion: direct laryngoscopy vs. intubating laryngeal mask.
Waltl B; Melischek M; Schuschnig C; Kabon B; Erlacher W; Nasel C; Fuchs M; Kapral S
Anaesthesia; 2001 Mar; 56(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11251427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes.
Hirabayashi Y; Fujita A; Seo N; Sugimoto H
Anaesthesia; 2008 Jun; 63(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 18477276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Bullard, GlideScope, Viewmax, and Macintosh laryngoscopes using a cadaver model to simulate the difficult airway.
Zamora JE; Nolan RL; Sharan S; Day AG
J Clin Anesth; 2011 Feb; 23(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21296244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.
Hindman BJ; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; From RP; Todd MM
Anesthesiology; 2014 Aug; 121(2):260-71. PubMed ID: 24739996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation with different airway devices.
Kılıç T; Goksu E; Durmaz D; Yıldız G
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jul; 31(7):1034-6. PubMed ID: 23702063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Airtraq, LMA CTrach and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation Training: A Randomized Comparative Manikin Study.
Saraçoğlu A; Dal D; Baygın Ö; Göğüş FY
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2016 Apr; 44(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 27366562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Flexiblade and Macintosh laryngoscopes: cervical extension angles during orotracheal intubation.
Uzun S; Erden IA; Pamuk AG; Yavuz K; Cekirge S; Aypar U
Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):692-6. PubMed ID: 20642524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
