162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31657988)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Three Obturating Techniques in Primary Molars: An
Ellana Jermiah J; Rao A; Srikant N; Rao A; Suprabha BS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(6):372-375. PubMed ID: 31657988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography.
Memarpour M; Shahidi S; Meshki R
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 23756307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Analysis of Voids and Sealing Ability of Different Obturating Techniques Using CBCT.
Singh A; Anand S; Prakash R; Ahmed A; Dhawan J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Oct; 23(10):1021-1025. PubMed ID: 37073916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tamponade effect of resorbable biological barrier in quality of obturation in primary molar.
Kakade A; Shetty H; Santosh A; Mali S; Badnaware S; Deshmukh B; Banthiya K
J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Nov; 10(4):e12468. PubMed ID: 31544328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative assessment of different techniques for obturation with endoflas in primary molars: An
Pandranki J; Chitturi RR; Vanga NR; Chandrabhatla SK
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 28393816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study.
Grover R; Mehra M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 23758458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Different Root Canal Obturation Methods in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography.
Singh R; Chaudhary S; Manuja N; Chaitra TR; Sinha AA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 26551371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative volumetric analysis of three different obturating materials in primary molars under cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
Pandey A; K P; Avinash A; Pathivada L; Kumar B; Kapur D
Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36197278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study.
Subramaniam P; Gilhotra K
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 35(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 22046693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of three obturation techniques in primary incisors using digital intra-oral receptor and C.B.C.T-an in vitro study.
Akhil JEJ; Prashant B; Shashibushan KK
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):689-696. PubMed ID: 29744724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Degradation evaluation and success of pulpectomy with a modified primary root canal filling in primary molars].
Chen XX; Lin BC; Zhong J; Ge LH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 26080888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Four Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Singh A; Gupta N; Agarwal N; Kumar D; Anand A
Pediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 39(2):11-16. PubMed ID: 28390451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric Evaluation of Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Spiral Computed Tomography.
Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Reddy VS; Roshan NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 28052215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and radiological evaluation of zinc oxide-eugenol and Maisto's paste as obturating materials in infected primary teeth--nine months study.
Reddy VV; Fernandes
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9522755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials for primary molars: a clinical and radiographic study.
Nadkarni U; Damle SG
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2000 Mar; 18(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11323998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eighteen-month clinical and radiographic evaluation of two root canal-filling materials in primary teeth with pulp necrosis secondary to trauma.
Pinto DN; de Sousa DL; Araújo RB; Moreira-Neto JJ
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Jun; 27(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 21342437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
RojaRamya KS; Vinay C; Uloopi KS; Chandrasekhar R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 32611864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Root canal obturation materials and filling techniques for primary teeth: In vitro evaluation in polymer-based prototyped incisors.
Aragão AC; Pintor AVB; Marceliano-Alves M; Primo LG; Silva ASS; Lopes RT; Neves AA
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2020 May; 30(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 31811738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study.
Guelmann M; McEachern M; Turner C
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2004; 28(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 15366621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
