These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31658035)
1. Reliability and criterion validity of the "Gyroscope" application of the iPod™ for measuring lumbar range of motion. Boudreau N; Brochu FO; Dubreuil LM; Laurendeau T; Leblanc O; De Vette E; Tousignant-Laflamme Y J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 31658035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants. Tousignant-Laflamme Y; Boutin N; Dion AM; Vallée CA J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jul; 10(1):69. PubMed ID: 23829201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion. Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® application for measuring active lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion in patients with low back pain. Pourahmadi M; Momeni E; Mohseni N; Hesarikia H; Ghanjal A; Shamsoddini A Physiother Theory Pract; 2021 Jan; 37(1):204-217. PubMed ID: 31081417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of an iPhone(®) application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion. Pourahmadi MR; Taghipour M; Jannati E; Mohseni-Bandpei MA; Ebrahimi Takamjani I; Rajabzadeh F PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2355. PubMed ID: 27635328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Smartphone Inclinometer Application to Quantify Cervical Spine Mobility. Guidetti L; Placentino U; Baldari C Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1359-E1366. PubMed ID: 26905732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of dual inclinometer for lumbar range of motion using two different Landmarking techniques. Ahmed I; Mohseni Bandpei MA; Gilani SA; Ahmad A; Zaidi F J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Oct; 72(10):1994-1997. PubMed ID: 36660987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of the Microgate Gyko for measuring range of motion of the low back. Hamersma DT; Hofste A; Rijken NHM; Roe Of Rohé M; Oosterveld FGJ; Soer R Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2020 Feb; 45():102091. PubMed ID: 31735439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and Validity of Cervical Range of Motion and Muscle Strength Testing. Kubas C; Chen YW; Echeverri S; McCann SL; Denhoed MJ; Walker CJ; Kennedy CN; Reid WD J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1087-1096. PubMed ID: 27467513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and concurrent validity of a mobile application to measure thoracolumbar range of motion in low back pain patients. de Brito Macedo L; Borges DT; Melo SA; da Costa KSA; de Oliveira Sousa C; Brasileiro JS J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 31127756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion. Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of quality measures of movement in lumbar spine flexion-extension radiography. Taghipour-Darzi M; Ebrahimi-Takamjani E; Salavati M; Mobini B; Zekavat H J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2009; 22(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 20023344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications. Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of the Cervical Spine Device for the Assessment of Cervical Spine Range of Motion in Asymptomatic Participants. Mangone M; Bernetti A; Germanotta M; Di Sipio E; Razzano C; Ioppolo F; Santilli V; Venditto T; Paoloni M J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2018 May; 41(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 29751851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric Properties of the iHandy Level Smartphone Application for Measuring Lumbar Spine Range of Motion and Lordosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Pourahmadi M; Hesarikia H; Ghanjal A; Shamsoddini A J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 29(3):352-359. PubMed ID: 30860415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument. Kachingwe AF; Phillips BJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2347-53. PubMed ID: 16344034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone. Shin SH; Ro du H; Lee OS; Oh JH; Kim SH Man Ther; 2012 Aug; 17(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22421186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and concurrent validity of the BROM II for measuring lumbar mobility. Breum J; Wiberg J; Bolton JE J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):497-502. PubMed ID: 8583171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new iPhone application for measuring active craniocervical range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain: a reliability and validity study. Pourahmadi MR; Bagheri R; Taghipour M; Takamjani IE; Sarrafzadeh J; Mohseni-Bandpei MA Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 28890223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of neutral and target lumbar positioning tests in subjects with and without non-specific lower back pain. Reddy RS; Alahmari KA; Samuel PS; Tedla JS; Kakaraparthi VN; Rengaramanujam K J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2021; 34(2):289-299. PubMed ID: 33285625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]