172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31658035)
21. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of neutral and target lumbar positioning tests in subjects with and without non-specific lower back pain.
Reddy RS; Alahmari KA; Samuel PS; Tedla JS; Kakaraparthi VN; Rengaramanujam K
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2021; 34(2):289-299. PubMed ID: 33285625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The reliability and validity of the computerized double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility.
MacDermid JC; Arumugam V; Vincent JI; Carroll KL
Open Orthop J; 2014; 8():355-60. PubMed ID: 25352928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change.
Tousignant M; Poulin L; Marchand S; Viau A; Place C
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(10):553-9. PubMed ID: 16019864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual and instrumental diagnostics using chromokinegraphics: Reliability and validity for low back pain stratification.
Giesche F; Krause F; Niederer D; Wilke J; Engeroff T; Vogt L; Banzer W
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2019; 32(2):345-353. PubMed ID: 30412482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An Optoelectronic System for Measuring the Range of Motion in Healthy Volunteers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Medina-Mirapeix F; Martín-San Agustín R; Cánovas-Ambit G; García-Vidal JA; Gacto-Sánchez M; Escolar-Reina P
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Aug; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31443368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study.
Naylor JM; Ko V; Adie S; Gaskin C; Walker R; Harris IA; Mittal R
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Apr; 12():77. PubMed ID: 21496347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study.
Morphett AL; Crawford CM; Lee D
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12704307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension.
MacDermid JC; Arumugam V; Vincent JI; Payne KL; So AK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 May; 16():121. PubMed ID: 25989834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity and reliability of the GYKO inertial sensor system for the assessment of the elbow range of motion.
Santospagnuolo A; Bruno AA; Pagnoni A; Martello F; Santoboni F; Perroni F; Vulpiani MC; Vetrano M
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Sep; 59(9):1466-1471. PubMed ID: 31610638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reliability and concurrent validity of a Smartphone, bubble inclinometer and motion analysis system for measurement of hip joint range of motion.
Charlton PC; Mentiplay BF; Pua YH; Clark RA
J Sci Med Sport; 2015 May; 18(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 24831757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reproducibility of lumbar spine range of motion measurements using the back range of motion device.
Madson TJ; Youdas JW; Suman VJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1999 Aug; 29(8):470-7. PubMed ID: 10444737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of an objective device for assessing circumductive wrist motion.
Franko OI; Lal S; Pauyo T; Alexander M; Zurakowski D; Day C
J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 33(8):1293-300. PubMed ID: 18929191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system.
Moutzouri M; Billis E; Strimpakos N; Kottika P; Oldham JA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Oct; 9():131. PubMed ID: 18828921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Spineangel: Examining the validity and reliability of a novel clinical device for monitoring trunk motion.
Intolo P; Carman AB; Milosavljevic S; Abbott JH; Baxter GD
Man Ther; 2010 Apr; 15(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 19945335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.
Roussel NA; Truijen S; De Kerf I; Lambeets D; Nijs J; Stassijns G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 18374015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validity and intra-rater reliability of an android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion.
Quek J; Brauer SG; Treleaven J; Pua YH; Mentiplay B; Clark RA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 11():65. PubMed ID: 24742001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating.
Nitschke JE; Nattrass CL; Disler PB; Chou MJ; Ooi KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 10025021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion: intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 commonly used clinical tests.
Robinson HS; Mengshoel AM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):E270-5. PubMed ID: 24253798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units in Active Range of Motion Assessment in the Hip Joint.
Stołowski Ł; Niedziela M; Lubiatowski B; Lubiatowski P; Piontek T
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Oct; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 37960493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
