282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31658107)
1. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SH; Park YS
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of automated blood pressure measurements in the presence of atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clark CE; McDonagh STJ; McManus RJ
J Hum Hypertens; 2019 May; 33(5):352-364. PubMed ID: 30631126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of an oscillometric blood pressure measuring device: a substudy of the HOT Study. Hypertension Optimal Treatment.
Lithell H; Berglund L
Blood Press; 1998 May; 7(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 9758084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
