These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31659039)

  • 41. Motion-in-depth perception and prey capture in the praying mantis
    Nityananda V; Joubier C; Tan J; Tarawneh G; Read JCA
    J Exp Biol; 2019 May; 222(Pt 11):. PubMed ID: 31064852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Naïve Chicks Prefer Hollow Objects.
    Versace E; Schill J; Nencini AM; Vallortigara G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166425. PubMed ID: 27851773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of early experience on processing 2D threatening pictures by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).
    Belin L; Formanek L; Heyraud C; Hausberger M; Henry L
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Nov; 21(6):749-758. PubMed ID: 30132155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fight, fatigue and flight: narrowing of attention to a threat compensates for decreased anti-predator vigilance.
    Ota K
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Apr; 221(Pt 7):. PubMed ID: 29496778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Approaching threats elicit a freeze-like response in humans.
    Sagliano L; Cappuccio A; Trojano L; Conson M
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Feb; 561():35-40. PubMed ID: 24373990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Escape behaviors in insects.
    Card GM
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2012 Apr; 22(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 22226514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Antennal pointing at a looming object in the cricket Acheta domesticus.
    Yamawaki Y; Ishibashi W
    J Insect Physiol; 2014 Jan; 60():80-91. PubMed ID: 24287453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Visually inexperienced chicks exhibit spontaneous preference for biological motion patterns.
    Vallortigara G; Regolin L; Marconato F
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Jul; 3(7):e208. PubMed ID: 15934787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Do responses of galliform birds vary adaptively with predator size?
    Palleroni A; Hauser M; Marler P
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Jul; 8(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 15660209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dysfunctional Freezing Responses to Approaching Stimuli in Persons with a Looming Cognitive Style for Physical Threats.
    Riskind JH; Sagliano L; Trojano L; Conson M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():521. PubMed ID: 27148129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sharks modulate their escape behavior in response to predator size, speed and approach orientation.
    Seamone S; Blaine T; Higham TE
    Zoology (Jena); 2014 Dec; 117(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 25041843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Adaptive forgetting in Iberian green frog tadpoles (Pelophylax perezi): learned irrelevance and latent inhibition may avoid predator misidentification.
    Gonzalo A; López P; Martín J
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 Feb; 127(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 22866772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Escape behavior and neuronal responses to looming stimuli in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Decapoda: Grapsidae).
    Oliva D; Medan V; Tomsic D
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Mar; 210(Pt 5):865-80. PubMed ID: 17297146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Further evidence for mirror-reversed laterality in lines of fish selected for leftward or rightward turning when facing a predator model.
    Bisazza A; Dadda M; Cantalupo C
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 15582102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual spatial location influences selection of instinctive behaviours in mouse.
    Solomon SG; Janbon H; Bimson A; Wheatcroft T
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Apr; 10(4):230034. PubMed ID: 37122945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rodents in open space adjust their behavioral response to the different risk levels during barn-owl attack.
    Edut S; Eilam D
    BMC Ecol; 2003 Nov; 3():10. PubMed ID: 14614781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sex Differences in Foraging Rats to Naturalistic Aerial Predator Stimuli.
    Zambetti PR; Schuessler BP; Kim JJ
    iScience; 2019 Jun; 16():442-452. PubMed ID: 31229893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ontogeny of defensive reactions in Norway rats.
    Bronstein PM; Hirsch SM
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1976 Jul; 90(7):620-9. PubMed ID: 950390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Neural Circuit Mechanisms Involved in Animals' Detection of and Response to Visual Threats.
    Wu Q; Zhang Y
    Neurosci Bull; 2023 Jun; 39(6):994-1008. PubMed ID: 36694085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Escape responses in juvenile Atlantic cod Gadus morhua L.: the effects of turbidity and predator speed.
    Meager JJ; Domenici P; Shingles A; Utne-Palm AC
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Oct; 209(Pt 20):4174-84. PubMed ID: 17023610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.