165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31659464)
1. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study.
Ozimek T; Wiessmeyer JR; Struck JP; Roesch MC; Gilbert N; Laturnus JM; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
BMC Urol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):84. PubMed ID: 35705924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre.
Vaddi CM; Ramakrishna P; Ganesan S; Swamy S; Anandan H; Babu M
Cent European J Urol; 2022; 75(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 35937666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The "no-touch" technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones.
Geavlete B; Cozma C; Geavlete P
J Med Life; 2021; 14(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 34621370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of flexible uretero-renoscopy in management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys: single-center experience.
Singh AG; Chhabra JS; Sabnis R; Ganpule A; Jairath A; Shah D; Desai M
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):319-324. PubMed ID: 27306685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.
Somani BK; Al-Qahtani SM; de Medina SD; Traxer O
Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1017-9. PubMed ID: 24001703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jun DY; Cho KS; Jeong JY; Moon YJ; Kang DH; Jung HD; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Oct; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.
Yang E; Jing S; Niu Y; Qi S; Yadav PK; Yang L; Bao J; Tian J; Wang J; Li N; Ou T; Wang Z
J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1773-1778. PubMed ID: 34375127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
