187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31659850)
21. Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment.
Sicsic J; Pelletier-Fleury N; Moumjid N
Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 29304944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Eliciting women's preferences for place of child birth at a peri-urban setting in Nairobi, Kenya: A discrete choice experiment.
Oluoch-Aridi J; Adam MB; Wafula F; K'okwaro G
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242149. PubMed ID: 33301447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Women's preferences and experiences of cervical cancer screening in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
Majid U; Kandasamy S; Farrah K; Vanstone M
Rural Remote Health; 2019 Oct; 19(4):5190. PubMed ID: 31640391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study.
Swancutt DR; Greenfield SM; Wilson S
BMC Womens Health; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18194523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Eliciting women's preference for prenatal testing in China: a discrete choice experiment.
Wu L; Wu Y; Zou S; Sun C; Chen J; Li X; Lin Z; Guan L; Zeng Q; Zhao S; Liang J; Chen R; Hu Z; Au K; Xie D; Xiao X; Ming WK
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):604. PubMed ID: 33032548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK.
Dennison RA; Thomas CV; Morris S; Usher-Smith JA
Prev Med; 2023 Dec; 177():107786. PubMed ID: 37984646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genital self-sampling for HPV-based cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study of preferences and barriers in rural Ethiopia.
Brandt T; Wubneh SB; Handebo S; Debalkie G; Ayanaw Y; Alemu K; Jede F; von Knebel Doeberitz M; Bussmann H
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):1026. PubMed ID: 31366402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Understanding what women want: eliciting preference for delivery health facility in a rural subcounty in Kenya, a discrete choice experiment.
Oluoch-Aridi J; Adam MB; Wafula F; Kokwaro G
BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e038865. PubMed ID: 33268407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Examining the attitudes and preferences of health care decision-makers in relation to access, equity and cost-effectiveness: a discrete choice experiment.
Ratcliffe J; Bekker HL; Dolan P; Edlin R
Health Policy; 2009 Apr; 90(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18937994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment.
Fletcher B; Hinton L; McManus R; Rivero-Arias O
Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Sep; 69(686):e629-e637. PubMed ID: 31405832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Individuals' Preferences for Esophageal Cancer Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Peters Y; van Grinsven E; van de Haterd M; van Lankveld D; Verbakel J; Siersema PD
Value Health; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 32828222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acceptability and Feasibility of HPV Self-Sampling as an Alternative Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Population Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Wong EL; Cheung AW; Wong AY; Chan PK
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32867315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Role of Survey Training Materials in Stated-Preference Studies.
Vass CM; Davison NJ; Vander Stichele G; Payne K
Patient; 2020 Apr; 13(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 31565784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patient Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Zambia: Protocol for a Multi-Cohort Discrete Choice Experiment.
Subramanian S; Kaganova Y; Zhang Y; Hoover S; Nyambe N; Pinder L; Chibwesha C; Kapambwe S; Parham G
JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Jul; 7(7):e10429. PubMed ID: 30045833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of use of vaginal HPV self-sampling and offering flexible appointments as strategies to reach long-term non-attending women in organized cervical screening.
Darlin L; Borgfeldt C; Forslund O; Hénic E; Hortlund M; Dillner J; Kannisto P
J Clin Virol; 2013 Sep; 58(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 23867008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Women's preferences, willingness-to-pay, and predicted uptake for single-nucleotide polymorphism gene testing to guide personalized breast cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.
Wong XY; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Tan CS; van Til JA; Hartman M; Chong KJ; IJzerman MJ; Wee HL
Patient Prefer Adherence; 2018; 12():1837-1852. PubMed ID: 30271127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Heterogeneous Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Germany: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Brinkmann M; Diedrich L; Hemmerling M; Krauth C; Robra BP; Stahmeyer JT; Dreier M
Value Health; 2023 Jan; 26(1):104-114. PubMed ID: 36031478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
