These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31660624)

  • 21. The Use of Dynamic Pharmacophore in Computer-Aided Hit Discovery: A Case Study.
    Perricone U; Wieder M; Seidel T; Langer T; Padova A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1824():317-333. PubMed ID: 30039416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling Protein-Protein Recognition in Solution Using the Coarse-Grained Force Field SCORPION.
    Basdevant N; Borgis D; Ha-Duong T
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jan; 9(1):803-13. PubMed ID: 26589072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CHARMM-GUI 10 years for biomolecular modeling and simulation.
    Jo S; Cheng X; Lee J; Kim S; Park SJ; Patel DS; Beaven AH; Lee KI; Rui H; Park S; Lee HS; Roux B; MacKerell AD; Klauda JB; Qi Y; Im W
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27862047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating thermodynamic integration performance of the new amber molecular dynamics package and assess potential halogen bonds of enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI) benzimidazole inhibitors.
    Su PC; Johnson ME
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Apr; 37(9):836-47. PubMed ID: 26666582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains. II. Langevin and Berendsen-bath dynamics and tests on model alpha-helical systems.
    Khalili M; Liwo A; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem B; 2005 Jul; 109(28):13798-810. PubMed ID: 16852728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Protein-Drug Complexes: A Computational Protocol for Investigating the Interactions of Small-Molecule Therapeutics with Biological Targets and Biosensors.
    Hadden JA; Perilla JR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():245-270. PubMed ID: 29594776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. NanoModeler: A Webserver for Molecular Simulations and Engineering of Nanoparticles.
    Franco-Ulloa S; Riccardi L; Rimembrana F; Pini M; De Vivo M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):2022-2032. PubMed ID: 30758952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hybrid Methods for Modeling Protein Structures Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Data.
    Ekimoto T; Ikeguchi M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1105():237-258. PubMed ID: 30617833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Molecular dynamics simulations of B '-DNA: sequence effects on A-tract-induced bending and flexibility.
    McConnell KJ; Beveridge DL
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Nov; 314(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 11724529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incorporating receptor flexibility in the molecular design of protein interfaces.
    Li L; Liang S; Pilcher MM; Meroueh SO
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):575-86. PubMed ID: 19643976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. PUPIL: A Software Integration System for Multi-Scale QM/MM-MD Simulations and Its Application to Biomolecular Systems.
    Torras J; Roberts BP; Seabra GM; Trickey SB
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2015; 100():1-31. PubMed ID: 26415839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scalable nanohelices for predictive studies and enhanced 3D visualization.
    Meagher KA; Doblack BN; Ramirez M; Davila LP
    J Vis Exp; 2014 Nov; (93):e51372. PubMed ID: 25407548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Molecular dynamics simulations of complexes between wild-type and mutant anthrax protective antigen variants and a model anthrax toxin receptor.
    Stiles L; Nelson DJ
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2005 Apr; 22(5):503-19. PubMed ID: 15702923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved model of hydrated calcium ion for molecular dynamics simulations using classical biomolecular force fields.
    Yoo J; Wilson J; Aksimentiev A
    Biopolymers; 2016 Oct; 105(10):752-63. PubMed ID: 27144470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simple, yet powerful methodologies for conformational sampling of proteins.
    Harada R; Takano Y; Baba T; Shigeta Y
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2015 Mar; 17(9):6155-73. PubMed ID: 25659594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations as an Aid in the Prediction of Domain Swapping of Computationally Designed Protein Variants.
    Mou Y; Huang PS; Thomas LM; Mayo SL
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Aug; 427(16):2697-706. PubMed ID: 26101839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Protocols for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of RNA Nanostructures.
    Kim T; Kasprzak WK; Shapiro BA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1632():33-64. PubMed ID: 28730431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Protein-protein structure prediction by scoring molecular dynamics trajectories of putative poses.
    Sarti E; Gladich I; Zamuner S; Correia BE; Laio A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84(9):1312-20. PubMed ID: 27253756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Are Redefining Our View of Peptides Interacting with Biological Membranes.
    Ulmschneider JP; Ulmschneider MB
    Acc Chem Res; 2018 May; 51(5):1106-1116. PubMed ID: 29667836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cutoff size need not strongly influence molecular dynamics results for solvated polypeptides.
    Beck DA; Armen RS; Daggett V
    Biochemistry; 2005 Jan; 44(2):609-16. PubMed ID: 15641786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.