These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31660624)

  • 41. Current Tools and Methods in Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations for Drug Design.
    Hernández-Rodríguez M; Rosales-Hernández MC; Mendieta-Wejebe JE; Martínez-Archundia M; Basurto JC
    Curr Med Chem; 2016; 23(34):3909-3924. PubMed ID: 27237821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Exploring the conformational and binding properties of unphosphorylated/phosphorylated monomeric and trimeric Bcl-2 through docking and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Zacarías-Lara OJ; Correa-Basurto J; Bello M
    Biopolymers; 2016 Jul; 105(7):393-413. PubMed ID: 27016043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Efficient preparation and analysis of membrane and membrane protein systems.
    Javanainen M; Martinez-Seara H
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Oct; 1858(10):2468-2482. PubMed ID: 26947184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Algorithms of GPU-enabled reactive force field (ReaxFF) molecular dynamics.
    Zheng M; Li X; Guo L
    J Mol Graph Model; 2013 Apr; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 23454611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prediction of Ordered Water Molecules in Protein Binding Sites from Molecular Dynamics Simulations: The Impact of Ligand Binding on Hydration Networks.
    Rudling A; Orro A; Carlsson J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Feb; 58(2):350-361. PubMed ID: 29308882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Common Hits Approach: Combining Pharmacophore Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Wieder M; Garon A; Perricone U; Boresch S; Seidel T; Almerico AM; Langer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):365-385. PubMed ID: 28072524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hybrid method coupling molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations to study the properties of gases in microchannels and nanochannels.
    Nedea SV; Frijns AJ; van Steenhoven AA; Markvoort AJ; Hilbers PA
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Jul; 72(1 Pt 2):016705. PubMed ID: 16090132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of the octopamine receptor using GPUs: discovery of an alternate agonist-binding position.
    Kastner KW; Izaguirre JA
    Proteins; 2016 Oct; 84(10):1480-9. PubMed ID: 27318014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computationally efficient and accurate enantioselectivity modeling by clusters of molecular dynamics simulations.
    Wijma HJ; Marrink SJ; Janssen DB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2079-92. PubMed ID: 24916632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Combining Rosetta with molecular dynamics (MD): A benchmark of the MD-based ensemble protein design.
    Ludwiczak J; Jarmula A; Dunin-Horkawicz S
    J Struct Biol; 2018 Jul; 203(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 29454111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. ClickMD: an intuitive web-oriented molecular dynamics platform.
    Cristiani A; Brisotto N; Cedrati FC; Floris M; Scapozza L; Moro S
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Jun; 3(8):923-31. PubMed ID: 21707396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. GENESIS 1.1: A hybrid-parallel molecular dynamics simulator with enhanced sampling algorithms on multiple computational platforms.
    Kobayashi C; Jung J; Matsunaga Y; Mori T; Ando T; Tamura K; Kamiya M; Sugita Y
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Sep; 38(25):2193-2206. PubMed ID: 28718930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. MDTraj: A Modern Open Library for the Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories.
    McGibbon RT; Beauchamp KA; Harrigan MP; Klein C; Swails JM; Hernández CX; Schwantes CR; Wang LP; Lane TJ; Pande VS
    Biophys J; 2015 Oct; 109(8):1528-32. PubMed ID: 26488642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Refining evERdock: Improved selection of good protein-protein complex models achieved by MD optimization and use of multiple conformations.
    Shinobu A; Takemura K; Matubayasi N; Kitao A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Nov; 149(19):195101. PubMed ID: 30466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. VFFDT: A New Software for Preparing AMBER Force Field Parameters for Metal-Containing Molecular Systems.
    Zheng S; Tang Q; He J; Du S; Xu S; Wang C; Xu Y; Lin F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Apr; 56(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 26998926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Molecular Docking Simulations with ArgusLab.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():203-220. PubMed ID: 31452107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perturbation Approaches for Exploring Protein Binding Site Flexibility to Predict Transient Binding Pockets.
    Kokh DB; Czodrowski P; Rippmann F; Wade RC
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):4100-13. PubMed ID: 27399277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bringing Molecular Dynamics Simulation Data into View.
    Hildebrand PW; Rose AS; Tiemann JKS
    Trends Biochem Sci; 2019 Nov; 44(11):902-913. PubMed ID: 31301982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Grid-enabled web portal for NMR structure refinement with AMBER.
    Bertini I; Case DA; Ferella L; Giachetti A; Rosato A
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 27(17):2384-90. PubMed ID: 21757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu K; Watanabe E; Kokubo H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 28074360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.