324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31660936)
21. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches.
Loy LM; Lim GH; Leow JJ; Lee CH; Tan TW; Tan CH
Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):650-660. PubMed ID: 32505458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of complications after transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy using a risk-stratified pathway identifying patients at risk for post-biopsy infections.
Berg S; Tully KH; Hoffmann V; Bahlburg H; Roghmann F; Müller G; Noldus J; Reike M
Scand J Urol; 2023; 57(1-6):41-46. PubMed ID: 36655512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical implementation of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging pathways for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Israël B; Immerzeel J; van der Leest M; Hannink G; Zámecnik P; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Debruyne F; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Barentsz J
BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):480-490. PubMed ID: 34358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing outcomes of transperineal to transrectal prostate biopsies performed under local anaesthesia.
Chen KW; Pek G; Yufei Q; Toh PC; Kuek N; Lee JKC; Tan LGL; Tsang WC; Chiong E
BJUI Compass; 2022 May; 3(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 35505694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Retrospective Comparison of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsies: Experience of a Single Surgeon.
Young R; Norris B; Reeves F; Peters JS
J Endourol; 2019 Jun; 33(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 30990058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic outcomes from transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies - experiences from a Swedish tertiary care Centre.
Ugge H; Jarl S; Georgouleas P; Andersson SO; Sundqvist P; Frey J
Scand J Urol; 2021 Dec; 55(6):434-440. PubMed ID: 34586039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy?
Grummet JP; Weerakoon M; Huang S; Lawrentschuk N; Frydenberg M; Moon DA; O'Reilly M; Murphy D
BJU Int; 2014 Sep; 114(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 24612341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.
Hara R; Jo Y; Fujii T; Kondo N; Yokoyoma T; Miyaji Y; Nagai A
Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18308081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Tu X; Liu Z; Chang T; Qiu S; Xu H; Bao Y; Yang L; Wei Q
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e860-e870. PubMed ID: 31281065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transperineal sector prostate biopsies: a local anesthetic outpatient technique.
Smith JB; Popert R; Nuttall MC; Vyas L; Kinsella J; Cahill D
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1344-9. PubMed ID: 24726315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy.
Emiliozzi P; Corsetti A; Tassi B; Federico G; Martini M; Pansadoro V
Urology; 2003 May; 61(5):961-6. PubMed ID: 12736016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Extensive biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach to improve prostate cancer detection.
Watanabe M; Hayashi T; Tsushima T; Irie S; Kaneshige T; Kumon H
Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):959-63. PubMed ID: 16351651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost analysis of pathology services comparing conventional 6-core transrectal biopsy versus transperineal saturation biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer.
Tham JH; Looi LM; Ghazali R
Malays J Pathol; 2022 Dec; 44(3):469-475. PubMed ID: 36591714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Shifting to transperineal prostate biopsy: A narrative review.
Chung Y; Hong SK
Prostate Int; 2024 Mar; 12(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 38523899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transperineal prostate biopsies for diagnosis of prostate cancer are well tolerated: a prospective study using patient-reported outcome measures.
Wadhwa K; Carmona-Echeveria L; Kuru T; Gaziev G; Serrao E; Parashar D; Frey J; Dimov I; Seidenader J; Acher P; Muir G; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Hadaschik B; Kastner C
Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 26924279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Final Results of the Randomized PERFECT trial (CCAFU-PR1).
Ploussard G; Barret E; Fiard G; Lenfant L; Malavaud B; Giannarini G; Almeras C; Aziza R; Renard-Penna R; Descotes JL; Rozet F; Beauval JB; Salin A; Rouprêt M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38403523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy with omission of antibiotic prophylaxis.
Setia SA; Smith J; Cendo D; Yoder J; Gorin MA; Allaway MJ; Vourganti S
BJU Int; 2022 Jul; 130(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 34491606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Local anaesthetic transperineal (LATP) prostate biopsy using a probe-mounted transperineal access system: a multicentre prospective outcome analysis.
Lopez JF; Campbell A; Omer A; Stroman L; Bondad J; Austin T; Reeves T; Phelan C; Leiblich A; Philippou Y; Lovegrove CE; Ranasinha N; Bryant RJ; Leslie T; Hamdy FC; Brewster S; Bell CR; Popert R; Hodgson D; Elsaghir M; Eddy B; Bolomytis S; Persad R; Reddy UD; Foley C; van Rij S; Lam W; Lamb AD
BJU Int; 2021 Sep; 128(3):311-318. PubMed ID: 33448607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
