These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3166154)

  • 1. [Alveolar recess in panoramic radiography].
    Rottke B; Bargatzki A
    Quintessenz; 1988 Feb; 39(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 3166154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of panorex and intraoral surveys for routine dental radiography.
    Stephens RG; Kogon SL; Reid JA; Ruprecht A
    Dent J; 1977 Jun; 43(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 267587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of alveolar bone].
    Taguchi A
    Clin Calcium; 2007 Feb; 17(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 17272876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
    Tal H; Moses O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative experimental studies of orthopantomographic pictures (Orthopantomograph 3, Panorex) and intraoral single radiographs for the radiographic presentation of the alveolar limbus].
    Schröder H
    ZWR; 1979 Nov; 88(22):1001-9. PubMed ID: 293999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
    Akesson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between panoramic radiographic techniques. Part II: Marginal bone level interpretability with Status-X and Orthopantomography Model OP 3.
    Strenström B; Julin P; Lavstedt S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1982; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 6954118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics.
    Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M; Zöger B
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 8362363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Denta Scan: CT software program used in the anatomic evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery.
    Casselman JW; Deryckere F; Hermans R; Declercq C; Neyt L; Pattyn G; Meeus L; Vandevoorde P; Steyaert L; Devos V
    Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 1854934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The evaluation of the marginal bone height on traditional and digitized panoramic radiographs].
    Larsen TS; Regli PE
    Tandlaegebladet; 1989 Jan; 93(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 2623591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A study of changes in oral residual alveolar ridge under the partial denture bearing occlusal stress].
    Liu WM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1991 Sep; 26(5):273-5, 316. PubMed ID: 1815857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Initial resorption of the interdental bone septums in diagnosis and prognosis of progressive periodontal diseases].
    Leković V; Zelić O
    Stomatol Vjesn; 1978; 7(3-4):61-3. PubMed ID: 293984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous cancellous bone and marrow graft: preliminary report.
    Bird JS; Kullbom TL; Quast GL
    J Oral Surg; 1974 Oct; 32(10):773-6. PubMed ID: 4606195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the significance of the orthopantogram in periodontology].
    Drízhal I; Zíková B
    Cesk Stomatol; 1980 Sep; 80(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 6932264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction radiography for assessing alveolar bone grafts: diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity.
    Maruko EY; Forbes DP
    Northwest Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 8148133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distal radiolucency.
    Ballard BC; Lin YL
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(4):363, 367. PubMed ID: 15366306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and panoramic assessment of marginal bone loss. A cadaver study.
    Soikkonen K; Wolf J; Tenkanen M
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1990; 86(3-4):137-41. PubMed ID: 2094846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiographic methods for the diagnosis of marginal periodontal bone loss - a literature review].
    Sewerin I
    Tandlaegebladet; 1983 Oct; 87(19):668-73. PubMed ID: 6369600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure and anode-film distance in periapical radiography.
    Wengraf AM
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1967 Mar; 17(7):235-9. PubMed ID: 5226880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.