135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31661682)
1. Cochlear Place of Stimulation Is One Determinant of Cochlear Implant Sound Quality.
Dorman MF; Cook Natale S; Baxter L; Zeitler DM; Carlson ML; Noble JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(5):264-269. PubMed ID: 31661682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell MJ; Cosentino S; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 20(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 30623318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users.
de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Snel-Bongers J; Böhringer S; Timp GRFM; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31977727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.
Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Claes A; Van Rompaey V; Van de Heyning P
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e149-59. PubMed ID: 26583480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Looking for Mickey Mouse™ But Finding a Munchkin: The Perceptual Effects of Frequency Upshifts for Single-Sided Deaf, Cochlear Implant Patients.
Dorman MF; Natale SC; Zeitler DM; Baxter L; Noble JH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3493-3499. PubMed ID: 31415186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.
Griessner A; Schatzer R; Steixner V; Rajan GP; Zierhofer C; Távora-Vieira D
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation.
Staisloff HE; Lee DH; Aronoff JM
Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():59-64. PubMed ID: 27208791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach.
Colletti V; Fiorino FG; Saccetto L; Giarbini N; Carner M
Audiology; 1999; 38(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 10431908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
Luo X; Garrett C
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitch ranking with different virtual channel configurations in electrical hearing.
Padilla M; Stupak N; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():54-62. PubMed ID: 28216122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
