245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31661870)
21. Sensing pressure distribution on a lower-limb exoskeleton physical human-machine interface.
De Rossi SM; Vitiello N; Lenzi T; Ronsse R; Koopman B; Persichetti A; Vecchi F; Ijspeert AJ; van der Kooij H; Carrozza MC
Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(1):207-27. PubMed ID: 22346574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Design and Optimization of a Hybrid-Driven Waist Rehabilitation Robot.
Zi B; Yin G; Zhang D
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Dec; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 27983626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Micera S; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 4():3. PubMed ID: 17309790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. SVM-Based Classification of sEMG Signals for Upper-Limb Self-Rehabilitation Training.
Cai S; Chen Y; Huang S; Wu Y; Zheng H; Li X; Xie L
Front Neurorobot; 2019; 13():31. PubMed ID: 31214010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interaction force and motion estimators facilitating impedance control of the upper limb rehabilitation robot.
Mancisidor A; Zubizarreta A; Cabanes I; Bengoa P; Jung JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():561-566. PubMed ID: 28813879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot.
Metzger JC; Lambercy O; Califfi A; Dinacci D; Petrillo C; Rossi P; Conti FM; Gassert R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 11():154. PubMed ID: 25399249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. sEMG-Based Gain-Tuned Compliance Control for the Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot during Passive Training.
Tian J; Wang H; Zheng S; Ning Y; Zhang X; Niu J; Vladareanu L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.
Sahoo AJ; Kumar Y
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):531-45. PubMed ID: 24898862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Experimental Study on Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Training of Stroke Patients Based on Adaptive Task Level: A Preliminary Study.
Pan L; Song A; Wang S; Duan S
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():2742595. PubMed ID: 30915351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Automated patient-robot assignment for a robotic rehabilitation gym: a simplified simulation model.
Miller BA; Adhikari B; Jiang C; Novak VD
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 19(1):126. PubMed ID: 36384813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Research on an ankle rehabilitation robot for hemiplegic patients after stroke.
Sun Z; Mu A; Wang C; Liu Q; Hao F; Wei J; Li W
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Oct; 237(10):1177-1189. PubMed ID: 37706474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of post-stroke upper-limb training with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot.
Hu XL; Tong KY; Wei XJ; Rong W; Susanto EA; Ho SK
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Oct; 23(5):1065-74. PubMed ID: 23932795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adaptive robot mediated upper limb training using electromyogram-based muscle fatigue indicators.
Thacham Poyil A; Steuber V; Amirabdollahian F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233545. PubMed ID: 32469912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Translation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service: a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic stroke.
Huang Y; Lai WP; Qian Q; Hu X; Tam EWC; Zheng Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Jun; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 29941043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A multi-sensorial hybrid control for robotic manipulation in human-robot workspaces.
Pomares J; Perea I; García GJ; Jara CA; Corrales JA; Torres F
Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(10):9839-62. PubMed ID: 22163729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multi-mode adaptive control strategy for a lower limb rehabilitation robot.
Liang X; Yan Y; Dai S; Guo Z; Li Z; Liu S; Su T
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1392599. PubMed ID: 38817926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A preliminary investigation into the design of pressure cushions and their potential applications for forearm robotic orthoses.
Alavi N; Zampierin S; Komeili M; Cocuzza S; Debei S; Menon C
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 May; 16(1):54. PubMed ID: 28482892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot in Sitting Position with a Review of Training Activities.
Eiammanussakul T; Sangveraphunsiri V
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():1927807. PubMed ID: 29808109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
