312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31663246)
1. Cost analysis of ureteroscopy (URS) vs extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of ureteric stones <10 mm in adults: a UK perspective.
Constanti M; Calvert RC; Thomas K; Dickinson A; Carlisle S
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):457-466. PubMed ID: 31663246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.
Bierkens AF; Hendrikx AJ; De La Rosette JJ; Stultiens GN; Beerlage HP; Arends AJ; Debruyne FM
Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9467473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
McClinton S; Cameron S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; McDonald A; Lam T; N'Dow J; Kilonzo M; Pickard R; Anson K; Keeley F; Burgess N; Clark CT; MacLennan S; Norrie J;
Trials; 2018 May; 19(1):286. PubMed ID: 29788982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopic stone treatment for adults with ureteric stones: the TISU non-inferiority RCT.
Dasgupta R; Cameron S; Aucott L; MacLennan G; Kilonzo MM; Lam TB; Thomas R; Norrie J; McDonald A; Anson K; N'Dow J; Burgess N; Clark CT; Keeley FX; MacLennan SJ; Starr K; McClinton S
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Mar; 26(19):1-70. PubMed ID: 35301982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-utility analysis of shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopic stone treatment in adults.
Kilonzo MM; Dasgupta R; Thomas R; Aucott L; MacLennan S; Lam TBL; Anson K; Cameron S; Starr K; Burgess N; Keeley FX; Clark CT; N'Dow J; MacLennan G; McClinton S
BJU Int; 2023 Feb; 131(2):253-261. PubMed ID: 35974700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?
Tiselius HG
Urol Res; 2005 Jun; 33(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 15924257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm.
Perez-Ardavin J; Lorenzo L; Caballer-Tarazona V; Budía-Alba A; Vivas-Consuelo D; Bahilo-Mateu P; Ordaz-Jurado G; Trassierra-Villa M; López-Acón JD; Boronat-Tormo F
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Sep; 44(7):505-511. PubMed ID: 32593640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS].
Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A
Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction.
Ghalayini IF; Al-Ghazo MA; Khader YS
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(6):656-64; discussion 664-7. PubMed ID: 17201943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.
Dasgupta R; Cameron S; Aucott L; MacLennan G; Thomas RE; Kilonzo MM; Lam TBL; N'Dow J; Norrie J; Anson K; Burgess N; Clark CT; Keeley FX; MacLennan SJ; Starr K; McClinton S
Eur Urol; 2021 Jul; 80(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 33810921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy with Ureteroscopic Lasertripsy for Management of Proximal Ureteral Stones.
Mustafa G; Mahar NA; Qureshi HH; Mustafa M; Fayaz M; Hassan AS
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2024 Jan; 34(1):101-104. PubMed ID: 38185970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
