188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31663969)
1. Optimal Pancreatic Surgery: Are We Making Progress in North America?
Beane JD; Borrebach JD; Zureikat AH; Kilbane EM; Thompson VM; Pitt HA
Ann Surg; 2021 Oct; 274(4):e355-e363. PubMed ID: 31663969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal hepatic surgery: Are we making progress in North America?
Beane JD; Hyer M; Mehta R; Onuma AE; Gleeson EM; Thompson VM; Pawlik TM; Pitt HA
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1741-1748. PubMed ID: 34325906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced morbidity with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Plotkin A; Ceppa EP; Zarzaur BL; Kilbane EM; Riall TS; Pitt HA
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Mar; 19(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 28161217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery: lessons learned from our initial experience.
Vicente E; Quijano Y; Ielpo B; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Malave L; Caruso R
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2017 Dec; 16(6):652-658. PubMed ID: 29291786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Chen K; Pan Y; Huang CJ; Chen QL; Zhang RC; Zhang MZ; Wang GY; Wang XF; Mou YP; Yan JF
BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):382. PubMed ID: 33836678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dislocation of intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: results of a prospective observational study.
Marchegiani G; Ramera M; Viviani E; Lombardo F; Cybulski A; Chincarini M; Malleo G; Bassi C; Zamboni GA; Salvia R
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2019 Mar; 404(2):213-222. PubMed ID: 30771076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of unplanned conversion to an open procedure during minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
Stiles ZE; Dickson PV; Deneve JL; Glazer ES; Dong L; Wan JY; Behrman SW
J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():168-177. PubMed ID: 29804849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes: Is Laparoscopy Still Justified?
Khachfe HH; Nassour I; Hammad AY; Hodges JC; AlMasri S; Liu H; deSilva A; Kraftician J; Lee KK; Pitt HA; Zureikat AH; Paniccia A
Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e563-e569. PubMed ID: 36000753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low drain fluid amylase predicts absence of pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.
Lee CW; Pitt HA; Riall TS; Ronnekleiv-Kelly SS; Israel JS; Leverson GE; Parmar AD; Kilbane EM; Hall BL; Weber SM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Nov; 18(11):1902-10. PubMed ID: 25112411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Operative Time on Outcomes after Pancreatic Resection: A Risk-Adjusted Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database.
Maggino L; Liu JB; Ecker BL; Pitt HA; Vollmer CM
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):844-857.e3. PubMed ID: 29408353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central Pancreatectomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Benign and Low-Grade Malignant Neoplasms: A Retrospective and Propensity Score-Matched Study with Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Pancreas Volumetry.
Lee DH; Han Y; Byun Y; Kim H; Kwon W; Jang JY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):1215-1224. PubMed ID: 31898101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term surgical morbidity and mortality of distal pancreatectomy performed for benign versus malignant diseases: a NSQIP analysis.
Daniel FE; Tamim HM; Hosni MN; Mailhac AC; Khalife MJ; Jamali FR; Faraj W
Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3927-3935. PubMed ID: 31598880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Xourafas D; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1911-1919. PubMed ID: 29943136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduced port minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: single-port laparoscopic versus robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy.
Han HJ; Kang CM
Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 29998392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes.
Liang S; Hameed U; Jayaraman S
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(39):14246-54. PubMed ID: 25339811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: is the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula comparable to that after open pancreatoduodenectomy?
Kantor O; Pitt HA; Talamonti MS; Roggin KK; Bentrem DJ; Prinz RA; Baker MS
Surgery; 2018 Mar; 163(3):587-593. PubMed ID: 29454444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy - The first meta-analysis.
Gavriilidis P; Lim C; Menahem B; Lahat E; Salloum C; Azoulay D
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Jul; 18(7):567-74. PubMed ID: 27346136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A favorable approach for frail patients with pancreatic cancer.
Farah E; Al Abbas A; Abreu AA; Cheng M; Yopp A; Wang S; Mansour J; Porembka M; Zeh HJ; Polanco PM
Surgery; 2024 Apr; 175(4):1168-1175. PubMed ID: 38307784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.
Nakamura M; Nakashima H
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2013 Apr; 20(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 23224732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
