These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31664272)
1. Smartphone Application as a Low-Cost Alternative for Digitizing Facial Defects: Is It Accurate Enough for Clinical Application? Elbashti ME; Sumita YI; Aswehlee AM; Seelaus R Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 31664272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility and Accuracy of Noncontact Three-Dimensional Digitizers for Geometric Facial Defects: An In Vitro Comparison. Aswehlee AM; Elbashti ME; Hattori M; Sumita YI; Taniguchi H Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(6):601–606. PubMed ID: 30339162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of capturing oncology facial defects with multimodal image fusion versus laser scanning. Jablonski RY; Osnes CA; Khambay BS; Nattress BR; Keeling AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):333-338. PubMed ID: 30955940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records. Li J; Chen Z; Decker AM; Wang HL; Joda T; Mendonca G; Lepidi L J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precision and Trueness of Computerized Optical Impressions in Maxillectomy Defects: An In Vitro 3D Comparison. Elbashti ME; Hattori M; Patzelt SB; Aswehlee AM; Sumita YI; Taniguchi H Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(3):289-292. PubMed ID: 31034547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A virtual analysis of the precision and accuracy of 3-dimensional ear casts generated from smartphone camera images. Farook TH; Rashid F; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Dudley J; Khursheed Alam M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):830-836. PubMed ID: 33642077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system. Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors. Hernandez A; Lemaire E Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning. Mai HN; Lee DH Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33396780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and Accuracy of Digitizing Edentulous Maxillectomy Defects: A Comparative Study. Elbashti ME; Hattori M; Patzelt SB; Schulze D; Sumita YI; Taniguchi H Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 28267823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of a dual-structured light facial scanner and interexaminer reliability. Piedra-Cascón W; Meyer MJ; Methani MM; Revilla-León M J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):567-574. PubMed ID: 31918895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Combined Application of Database and Three-Dimensional Image Registration Technology in the Restoration of Total Nose Defect. Zeng W; Chen G; Ju R; Yin H; Tian W; Tang W J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):e484-e487. PubMed ID: 29554069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and virtual validation of a novel digital workflow to rehabilitate palatal defects by using smartphone-integrated stereophotogrammetry (SPINS). Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Asif JA; Din AS; Mahyuddin MN; Alam MK Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8469. PubMed ID: 33875672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can smartphones be used for routine dental clinical application? A validation study for using smartphone-generated 3D facial images. Singh P; Hsung RT; Ajmera DH; Leung YY; McGrath C; Gu M J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104775. PubMed ID: 37944629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Novel Method to Evaluate Precision of Optical Implant Impressions with Commercial Scan Bodies-An Experimental Approach. Fluegge T; Att W; Metzger M; Nelson K J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 26466158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generation and evaluation of 3D digital casts of maxillary defects based on multisource data registration: A pilot clinical study. Ye H; Ma Q; Hou Y; Li M; Zhou Y J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):790-795. PubMed ID: 28449864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Dental Monitoring 3D digital dental models using photograph and video mode. Morris RS; Hoye LN; Elnagar MH; Atsawasuwan P; Galang-Boquiren MT; Caplin J; Viana GC; Obrez A; Kusnoto B Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):420-428. PubMed ID: 31474272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]