BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31665621)

  • 1. Different visual and auditory latencies affect cross-modal non-spatial repetition inhibition.
    Wu X; Wang A; Tang X; Zhang M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102940. PubMed ID: 31665621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How modality processing differences affect cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
    Wang A; Wu X; Tang X; Zhang M
    Psych J; 2020 Jun; 9(3):306-315. PubMed ID: 31908147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociable identity- and modality-specific neural representations as revealed by cross-modal nonspatial inhibition of return.
    Chi Y; Yue Z; Liu Y; Mo L; Chen Q
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Aug; 35(8):4002-15. PubMed ID: 24453184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repetition effects in auditory and visual recognition.
    Parks CM; Werner LLS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103021. PubMed ID: 32032815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition: An ERP study.
    Wu X; Wang A; Zhang M
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Aug; 734():135096. PubMed ID: 32470552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
    Wang L; Yue Z; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):867-78. PubMed ID: 22415447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of modality and repetition in a continuous recognition memory task: Repetition has no effect on auditory recognition memory.
    Amir Kassim A; Rehman R; Price JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():72-80. PubMed ID: 29407247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audio-visual integration in temporal perception.
    Wada Y; Kitagawa N; Noguchi K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):117-24. PubMed ID: 14511840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural practice effect during cross-modal selective attention: Supra-modal and modality-specific effects.
    Xia J; Zhang W; Jiang Y; Li Y; Chen Q
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():47-64. PubMed ID: 29864595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Existence of competing modality dominances.
    Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colavita dominance effect revisited: the effect of semantic congruity.
    Stubblefield A; Jacobs LA; Kim Y; Goolkasian P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1827-39. PubMed ID: 23943499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.
    Mondor TA; Amirault KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):745-55. PubMed ID: 9627413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-modal stimulus conflict: the behavioral effects of stimulus input timing in a visual-auditory Stroop task.
    Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; Park CJ; Roberts KC; Woldorff MG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e62802. PubMed ID: 23638149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of modality specific interference on working memory in recalling aversive auditory and visual memories
    Matthijssen SJMA; van Schie K; van den Hout MA
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 30465479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit perceptual learning of visual-auditory modality sequences.
    Koch I; Blotenberg I; Fedosejew V; Stephan DN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102979. PubMed ID: 31785577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Levels of neuroticism can predict attentional performance during cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
    Cai B; He H; Wang A; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 36253587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.