These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31665710)

  • 1. Piezoelectric displacement mapping of compliant surfaces by constant-excitation frequency-modulation piezoresponse force microscopy.
    Labardi M; Magnani A; Capaccioli S
    Nanotechnology; 2020 Feb; 31(7):075707. PubMed ID: 31665710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model of frequency-modulated atomic force microscopy for interpretation of noncontact piezoresponse measurements.
    Labardi M
    Nanotechnology; 2020 Mar; 31(24):245705. PubMed ID: 32109904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Piezoelectric Yield of Single Electrospun Poly(acrylonitrile) Ultrafine Fibers Studied by Piezoresponse Force Microscopy and Numerical Simulations.
    Montorsi M; Zavagna L; Scarpelli L; Azimi B; Capaccioli S; Danti S; Labardi M
    Polymers (Basel); 2024 May; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 38794498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Local Piezoelectric Response of Polymer/Ceramic Nanocomposite Fibers.
    Magnani A; Capaccioli S; Azimi B; Danti S; Labardi M
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 36559746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of surface displacements and electromechanical phenomena via dynamic atomic force microscopy.
    Balke N; Jesse S; Yu P; Ben Carmichael ; Kalinin SV; Tselev A
    Nanotechnology; 2016 Oct; 27(42):425707. PubMed ID: 27631885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance of electrostatic interactions due to surface potential in piezoresponse force microscopy.
    Seol D; Kang S; Sun C; Kim Y
    Ultramicroscopy; 2019 Dec; 207():112839. PubMed ID: 31494481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tuning-fork-based piezoresponse force microscopy.
    Labardi M; Capaccioli S
    Nanotechnology; 2021 Aug; 32(44):. PubMed ID: 34284362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic behaviour in piezoresponse force microscopy.
    Jesse S; Baddorf AP; Kalinin SV
    Nanotechnology; 2006 Mar; 17(6):1615-28. PubMed ID: 26558568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Near-zero contact force atomic force microscopy investigations using active electromagnetic cantilevers.
    Świadkowski B; Majstrzyk W; Kunicki P; Sierakowski A; Gotszalk T
    Nanotechnology; 2020 Jul; 31(42):. PubMed ID: 32599567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decoding Apparent Ferroelectricity in Perovskite Nanofibers.
    Ganeshkumar R; Somnath S; Cheah CW; Jesse S; Kalinin SV; Zhao R
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Dec; 9(48):42131-42138. PubMed ID: 29130311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nanoscale Ferroelectric Characterization with Heterodyne Megasonic Piezoresponse Force Microscopy.
    Zeng Q; Wang H; Xiong Z; Huang Q; Lu W; Sun K; Fan Z; Zeng K
    Adv Sci (Weinh); 2021 Apr; 8(8):2003993. PubMed ID: 33898182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrostatic-free piezoresponse force microscopy.
    Kim S; Seol D; Lu X; Alexe M; Kim Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41657. PubMed ID: 28139715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of in-contact probe-sample electrostatic forces with dynamic atomic force microscopy.
    Balke N; Jesse S; Carmichael B; Okatan MB; Kravchenko II; Kalinin SV; Tselev A
    Nanotechnology; 2017 Jan; 28(6):065704. PubMed ID: 28050969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft-contact imaging in liquid with frequency-modulation torsion resonance mode atomic force microscopy.
    Yang CW; Hwang IS
    Nanotechnology; 2010 Feb; 21(6):065710. PubMed ID: 20057020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrostatically-blind quantitative piezoresponse force microscopy free of distributed-force artifacts.
    Killgore JP; Robins L; Collins L
    Nanoscale Adv; 2022 Apr; 4(8):2036-2045. PubMed ID: 36133417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of the Electromechanical Measurements by Piezoresponse Force Microscopy.
    Buragohain P; Lu H; Richter C; Schenk T; Kariuki P; Glinsek S; Funakubo H; Íñiguez J; Defay E; Schroeder U; Gruverman A
    Adv Mater; 2022 Nov; 34(47):e2206237. PubMed ID: 36210741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wear-less floating contact imaging of polymer surfaces.
    Knoll A; Rothuizen H; Gotsmann B; Duerig U
    Nanotechnology; 2010 May; 21(18):185701. PubMed ID: 20378942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving tapping mode atomic force microscopy with piezoelectric cantilevers.
    Rogers B; Manning L; Sulchek T; Adams JD
    Ultramicroscopy; 2004 Aug; 100(3-4):267-76. PubMed ID: 15231319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modular apparatus for electrostatic actuation of common atomic force microscope cantilevers.
    Long CJ; Cannara RJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2015 Jul; 86(7):073703. PubMed ID: 26233392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single- and multi-frequency detection of surface displacements via scanning probe microscopy.
    Romanyuk K; Luchkin SY; Ivanov M; Kalinin A; Kholkin AL
    Microsc Microanal; 2015 Feb; 21(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 25555020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.