278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31665926)
1. Rasch Analysis of Reliability and Validity of Scores From the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
Matheny LM; Clanton TO
Foot Ankle Int; 2020 Feb; 41(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 31665926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders.
Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Negahban H; Sohani SM; Taghizadeh F; Feizi A; Karimi A; Parnianpour M
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2010 Jun; 18(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 20338253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient Reported Outcome Measures in the Foot and Ankle: Normative Values Do Not Reflect 100% Full Function.
Matheny LM; Gittner K; Harding J; Clanton TO
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Apr; 29(4):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 32468128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
Çelik D; Malkoç M; Martin R
Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1469-76. PubMed ID: 27136921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire.
Moreira TS; Magalhães Lde C; Silva RD; Martin RL; Resende MA
Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 38(25):2479-90. PubMed ID: 26878102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability.
Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu B; Celik D
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jan; 58(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 30448187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
Martin RL; Irrgang JJ; Burdett RG; Conti SF; Van Swearingen JM
Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Nov; 26(11):968-83. PubMed ID: 16309613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)].
Sartorio F; Vercelli S; Bravini E; Bargeri S; Moroso M; Plebani G; Ferriero G
Med Lav; 2014 Jul; 105(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25134631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure.
Weel H; Zwiers R; Azim D; Sierevelt IN; Haverkamp D; van Dijk CN; Kerkhoffs GM
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25536950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the Method of Administration Affect Reliability of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure?
Burcal CJ; Chung S; Johnston ML; Rosen AB
J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 29(7):1038-1041. PubMed ID: 32357314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus.
Martin RL; Hutt DM; Wukich DK
Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Apr; 30(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 19356352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp).
Cervera-Garvi P; Ortega-Avila AB; Morales-Asencio JM; Cervera-Marin JA; Martin RR; Gijon-Nogueron G
J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():39. PubMed ID: 28852426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function Scores Correlate With the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Patients With Hallux Valgus.
Nixon DC; McCormick JJ; Johnson JE; Klein SE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Nov; 475(11):2775-2780. PubMed ID: 28836098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.
Analay Akbaba Y; Celik D; Ogut RT
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(6):1139-1142. PubMed ID: 27614824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM.
Borloz S; Crevoisier X; Deriaz O; Ballabeni P; Martin RL; Luthi F
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Feb; 12():40. PubMed ID: 21303520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure.
Uematsu D; Suzuki H; Sasaki S; Nagano Y; Shinozuka N; Sunagawa N; Fukubayashi T
J Athl Train; 2015 Jan; 50(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25310247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form.
Arunakul M; Arunakul P; Suesiritumrong C; Angthong C; Chernchujit B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jun; 98(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 26219160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the severity of pain, functional limitations, and reduction of sports ability for german-speaking patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle (OCLA-G).
Lohrer H; Wagner S; Wenning M; Kühle J; Schmal H; Gollhofer A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May; 24(1):340. PubMed ID: 37127617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability.
Carcia CR; Martin RL; Drouin JM
J Athl Train; 2008; 43(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 18345343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability.
Nauck T; Lohrer H
Br J Sports Med; 2011 Aug; 45(10):785-90. PubMed ID: 19955163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
