189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31665928)
21. Improving sex estimation from crania using a novel three-dimensional quantitative method.
Abdel Fatah EE; Shirley NR; Jantz RL; Mahfouz MR
J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):590-600. PubMed ID: 24502609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sex estimation using external morphology of the frontal bone and frontal sinuses in a contemporary Czech population.
Čechová M; Dupej J; Brůžek J; Bejdová Š; Horák M; Velemínská J
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jul; 133(4):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 30982130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative Sex Estimation Based on Cranial Traits Using R Functions.
Nikita E
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):175-180. PubMed ID: 29856889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sex estimation from cranial morphological traits: Use of the methods across American Indians, modern North Americans, and ancient Egyptians.
Godde K; Thompson MM; Hens SM
Homo; 2018 Sep; 69(5):237-247. PubMed ID: 30269926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Morphometric evaluation of the orbital region for sex determination in a Saudi Arabian population using 3DCT images.
Packirisamy V; Aljarrah K; Nayak SB
Anat Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 99(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 37721654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sexual dimorphism of the craniofacial region in a South Indian population.
Nidugala H; Bhargavi C; Avadhani R; Bhaskar B
Singapore Med J; 2013 Aug; 54(8):458-62. PubMed ID: 24005453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing the effectiveness of two cranial base foramina for metric sex assessment of fragmentary remains.
Macaluso PJ
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1017-21. PubMed ID: 22390305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sex estimation from dimensions of the base of the skull in Black South Africans.
Dayal MR; Billings BK; Brits D; Abdallah A; Spocter MA; Bidmos MA
Anthropol Anz; 2022 Aug; 79(4):411-421. PubMed ID: 35191461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How reliable is the application of the sex classifier based on exocranial surface (Musilová et al., 2016) for geographically and temporally distant skull series.
Meinerová T; Šutoová D; Brukner Havelková P; Velemínská J; Dupej J; Bejdová Š
Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Nov; 352():111850. PubMed ID: 37827023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Demonstrating the empirical effect of population specificity of anthropological standards in a contemporary Australian population.
Swift L; Obertova Z; Franklin D
Int J Legal Med; 2024 Mar; 138(2):537-545. PubMed ID: 37269396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sexual dimorphism in Brazilian human skulls: discriminant function analysis.
Fortes de Oliveira O; Lima Ribeiro Tinoco R; Daruge Júnior E; Silveira Dias Terada AS; Alves da Silva RH; Paranhos LR
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2012 Dec; 30(2):26-33. PubMed ID: 23474506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Age-related differences in cranial sexual dimorphism in contemporary Europe.
Velemínská J; Fleischmannová N; Suchá B; Dupej J; Bejdová Š; Kotěrová A; Brůžek J
Int J Legal Med; 2021 Sep; 135(5):2033-2044. PubMed ID: 33649866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans.
Krüger GC; L'Abbé EN; Stull KE; Kenyhercz MW
Int J Legal Med; 2015 Jul; 129(4):869-75. PubMed ID: 25394745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of secular trends on sex assessment evaluated through femoral dimensions of the Czech population.
Guyomarc'h P; Velemínská J; Sedlak P; Dobisíková M; Švenkrtová I; Brůžek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():284.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26980521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greek-Cypriots and Cretans: Forensic applications.
Kranioti EK; García-Donas JG; Almeida Prado PS; Kyriakou XP; Langstaff HC
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():129.e1-129.e7. PubMed ID: 27919515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exocranial surfaces for sex assessment of the human cranium.
Musilová B; Dupej J; Velemínská J; Chaumoitre K; Bruzek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Dec; 269():70-77. PubMed ID: 27883982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sex Determination in Western Indian Population by Limb Measurements.
Gupta R; Nayyar AK; Gupta MK; Bhagat OL
Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Jul; 30(3):830-834. PubMed ID: 34226475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis and stature by regression analysis: a lateral cephalometric study.
Patil KR; Mody RN
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):175-80. PubMed ID: 15567623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
