755 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31669697)
1. Towards multi-dynamic mechano-biological optimization of 3D-printed scaffolds to foster bone regeneration.
Metz C; Duda GN; Checa S
Acta Biomater; 2020 Jan; 101():117-127. PubMed ID: 31669697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
Zhang L; Yang G; Johnson BN; Jia X
Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():16-33. PubMed ID: 30481607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial mechanical conditions within an optimized bone scaffold do not ensure bone regeneration - an in silico analysis.
Perier-Metz C; Duda GN; Checa S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Oct; 20(5):1723-1731. PubMed ID: 34097188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: From bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy.
Ma H; Feng C; Chang J; Wu C
Acta Biomater; 2018 Oct; 79():37-59. PubMed ID: 30165201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-functional 3D-printed composite scaffold for inhibiting bacterial infection and promoting bone regeneration in infected bone defect models.
Yang Y; Chu L; Yang S; Zhang H; Qin L; Guillaume O; Eglin D; Richards RG; Tang T
Acta Biomater; 2018 Oct; 79():265-275. PubMed ID: 30125670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Indirect selective laser sintering-printed microporous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold promotes endogenous bone regeneration via activation of ERK1/2 signaling.
Zeng H; Pathak JL; Shi Y; Ran J; Liang L; Yan Q; Wu T; Fan Q; Li M; Bai Y
Biofabrication; 2020 Mar; 12(2):025032. PubMed ID: 32084655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) surface nanomodified 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds for bone regeneration.
Wang M; Favi P; Cheng X; Golshan NH; Ziemer KS; Keidar M; Webster TJ
Acta Biomater; 2016 Dec; 46():256-265. PubMed ID: 27667017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechano-Biological Computer Model of Scaffold-Supported Bone Regeneration: Effect of Bone Graft and Scaffold Structure on Large Bone Defect Tissue Patterning.
Perier-Metz C; Duda GN; Checa S
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():585799. PubMed ID: 33262976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personalized 3D printed bone scaffolds: A review.
Mirkhalaf M; Men Y; Wang R; No Y; Zreiqat H
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():110-124. PubMed ID: 35429670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards resorbable 3D-printed scaffolds for craniofacial bone regeneration.
Karanth D; Song K; Martin ML; Meyer DR; Dolce C; Huang Y; Holliday LS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Dec; 26 Suppl 1():188-195. PubMed ID: 36866957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D printed polymer-mineral composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: Fabrication and characterization.
Babilotte J; Guduric V; Le Nihouannen D; Naveau A; Fricain JC; Catros S
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Nov; 107(8):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 30848068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone Tissue Engineering (BTE) of the Craniofacial Skeleton, Part I: Evolution and Optimization of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Repair of Defects.
Nayak VV; Slavin B; Bergamo ETP; Boczar D; Slavin BR; Runyan CM; Tovar N; Witek L; Coelho PG
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 34(7):2016-2025. PubMed ID: 37639650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PCL strut-like scaffolds appear superior to gyroid in terms of bone regeneration within a long bone large defect: An
Jaber M; Poh PSP; Duda GN; Checa S
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():995266. PubMed ID: 36213070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface modification of 3D-printed porous scaffolds via mussel-inspired polydopamine and effective immobilization of rhBMP-2 to promote osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering.
Lee SJ; Lee D; Yoon TR; Kim HK; Jo HH; Park JS; Lee JH; Kim WD; Kwon IK; Park SA
Acta Biomater; 2016 Aug; 40():182-191. PubMed ID: 26868173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chitosan-based 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Yadav LR; Chandran SV; Lavanya K; Selvamurugan N
Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Jul; 183():1925-1938. PubMed ID: 34097956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3D-Printed Biomaterial Scaffold Reinforced with Inorganic Fillers for Bone Tissue Engineering: In Vitro Assessment and In Vivo Animal Studies.
Sithole MN; Kumar P; Du Toit LC; Erlwanger KH; Ubanako PN; Choonara YE
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(8):. PubMed ID: 37108772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four-dimensional bioprinting: Current developments and applications in bone tissue engineering.
Wan Z; Zhang P; Liu Y; Lv L; Zhou Y
Acta Biomater; 2020 Jan; 101():26-42. PubMed ID: 31672585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gradient scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering and regeneration.
Zhang B; Huang J; Narayan RJ
J Mater Chem B; 2020 Sep; 8(36):8149-8170. PubMed ID: 32776030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of mechanical strength and bone regeneration ability of 3D printed kagome-structure scaffold using rabbit calvarial defect model.
Lee SH; Lee KG; Hwang JH; Cho YS; Lee KS; Jeong HJ; Park SH; Park Y; Cho YS; Lee BK
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 May; 98():949-959. PubMed ID: 30813102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-Dimensional Printing for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Qu M; Wang C; Zhou X; Libanori A; Jiang X; Xu W; Zhu S; Chen Q; Sun W; Khademhosseini A
Adv Healthc Mater; 2021 Jun; 10(11):e2001986. PubMed ID: 33876580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
